On 01/21/13 02:59, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:38:29AM +0100, Thomas de Roo wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The installation instructions on dash are followed by the suggestion to >> make /bin/sh a symbolic link to dash. This is a really bad suggestion on >> LFS, as it makes all the boot-scripts fail. (I just tried it on a newly >> installed machine.) Maybe that info could be added too. >> > Colour me surprised - I thought the scripts (post LFS-7.0) were > supposed to either be agnostic about what was used for /bin/sh, or > else to use /bin/bash if they had bash-specific features. Having > said that, I won't be surprised if any of the BLFS scripts I've > touched turn out to break [ I cannot imagine why people think it is a > good idea to build dash, but "your system, your rules" ]. > > But *all* of them fail with dash ? The pedant in me doubts that > you installed _everything_, so please can you specify _which_ > scripts fail if /bin/sh is a symlink to dash ? Or do you mean that > all the *LFS* bootscripts fail ? > > ĸen All of them might indeed be to big of a claim. I'll investigate to be more specific. I'll report back after another attempt...
Groet, Thomas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
