>On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 13:11:05 -0400 >alex lupu <[email protected]> wrote:
> I told integ that in my experience with Gmail, my links, no matter > how long, seem to always arrive at the destination in one piece, > ready for the addressee to use. > As further proof I re-sent him his original address using Gmail, _and_ > if he would get it correctly in one piece, ready to use, I dared offer > (humbly) > Gmail as an alternative in these "tricky" situations. > End of story. Oh! I'm sorry. Terribly sorry. I misunderstood what was going on. I thought that *you* and not Lux-integ were the one having problems since your mail comes from a Gmail address, while Lux-integ's comes from a Btconnect address. But it turns out that that was the opposite of what really happened. And there is nothing wrong, strange or bad in using a technological solution without knowing its underpinnings such as protocols. I'm sorry if I came out that way. I didn't mean to. Text characters have a way of not being able to transmit emotion together with words. I wanted to help and, in the case web interface was the problem, point out that there is a way around it, but it just came out bad. Really bad. -- You don't need an AI for a robot uprising. Humans will do just fine.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
