Em 17-10-2013 11:40, alex lupu escreveu: > Hi Bruce, > >>> ... >>> 921939 2012-03-27 12:51 libjpeg.so.8.4.0 >>> 425541 2013-09-30 12:05 libjpeg.so.8.0.2 >>> 16 2013-09-30 12:05 libjpeg.so.8 -> libjpeg.so.8.4.0 >>> 16 2013-09-30 12:05 libjpeg.so -> libjpeg.so.8.0.2 > >> ... >> Note that only libjpeg.so -> libjpeg.so.8.0.2 is used for new builds and >> libjpeg.so.8 points to libjpeg.so.8.4.0. I think there is a potential >> problem there. > > Was this problem caused by me (by mistake, obviously) or is this the way > libjpeg installs these days? > > Thank you very much, > -- Alex > >
I believe your problem is related to: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/3765> <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg16492.html> I wanted a small sentence in libjpeg-turbo added to warn users, but the ticket was closed as invalid. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
