Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 17-10-2013 11:40, alex lupu escreveu: >> Hi Bruce, >> >>>> ... >>>> 921939 2012-03-27 12:51 libjpeg.so.8.4.0 >>>> 425541 2013-09-30 12:05 libjpeg.so.8.0.2 >>>> 16 2013-09-30 12:05 libjpeg.so.8 -> libjpeg.so.8.4.0 >>>> 16 2013-09-30 12:05 libjpeg.so -> libjpeg.so.8.0.2 >> >>> ... >>> Note that only libjpeg.so -> libjpeg.so.8.0.2 is used for new builds and >>> libjpeg.so.8 points to libjpeg.so.8.4.0. I think there is a potential >>> problem there. >> >> Was this problem caused by me (by mistake, obviously) or is this the way >> libjpeg installs these days?
> I believe your problem is related to: > > <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/3765> > > <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg16492.html> > > I wanted a small sentence in libjpeg-turbo added to warn users, but the > ticket was closed as invalid. Fernando, I see both sides of the issue. If you want to add a note in the libjpeg-turbo page, go ahead. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
