Em 04-12-2013 09:15, akhiezer escreveu: >> Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:58:40 -0300 >> From: Fernando de Oliveira <[email protected]> >> To: BLFS Support List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Suggestions on Desktop Environment >> > . > . >> I could go with any WM, without a DE, but dislike having to manually >> edit the menus. Openbox is very good, with lxpanel, no need to edit >> menus. unfortunately, the developers of LXDE have conceived lxpanel so > > > Surely you'd script/program that; parse a simple spec of what you want on the > menus, and auto-gen/install the required-format menu(s); the lighter the WM, > often the simpler the structure required. I agree, I'd _reaLLY* dislike > 'having' to edit menus manually. > > >> that it needs to be reloaded after some applications do some operations >> and closes, so lxpanel unloads in Openbox, I created an entry in OB to >> reload it, got tired, and this made me to switch back to LXDE, because >> the applications in autostart that are preceeded by a "@" reloads if >> closed by any motive, so we have as default @lxpanel in autostart. >> > > > That's also quite easy to implem in a generic fashion: essentially see if pid > is active, if yes then raise/lower/iconify/un-iconify, else start instance of > prog and store pid. Use essentially, broadly, that under twm. The 'most > difficult' part in many WM/DE would be to reverse-engineer them to see how > to hook it in yrself. > > > > akh > >
Thanks. Will think about them. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
