Alexey Orishko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:41 AM, lux-integ <> wrote:
>> openssl is a package one generally installs  early in the distribution-build
>> process.   To upgrade to say openssl-1.0.1g
>> --(a)  does one need to yank out the old say openssl-1.0.1 and install the 
>> new
>> 1,0,1g and if so would there not be breakages?  OR
>> --(b) can one install openssl-1.0.1g over the old version  of  say
>> openssl-1.0.1 ?
>> advice from anyone on list will be much appreciated
> If any application was compiled with static openssl library, you have
> to recompile app in addition to installing a new shared lib/static.

I don't know of any packages in BLFS that use the static libraries by 
default or our instructions.  Some users may, however have done that for 

   -- Bruce

Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to