> Op 21-apr.-2015, om 21:58 heeft William Harrington <[email protected]> > het volgende geschreven: > > On Tue, April 21, 2015 17:48, Alexey Orishko wrote: > >> ip route show >> default via 192.168.10.10 dev eth0 >> 192.168.10.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.10 >> 192.168.10.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.11 >> >> PC2: eth0: 192.168.10.12/24 >> >> What bother me is the fact that PC2 located on the *same* network >> segment is not capable of reaching PC1 via eth1 if eth0 is dead. >> >> I wonder if kernel multipath has any influence over this…
> Looks like you need bonding? http://archive09.linux.com/feature/133849 pvg -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
