On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 08:30:53PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 01:17:15PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> 
> > I am not using any patches.
> > 
> > As of right now it is building.  I'll reply again after it finishes and I
> > can test.
> > 
> >   -- Bruce
> > 
> Without the patches, on gcc-6.1 and LFS from 20160527 and BLFS from
> 20160531 it fails almost immediately -
> /scratch/ken/firefox-47.0/firefox-build-dir/_virtualenv/bin/python
> /scratch/ken/firefox-47.0/config/expandlibs_gen.py -o
> libfallible.a.desc fallible.o  
[snip]

Usually when I'm testing an update it is simple to play with the
variables until it builds.  In this ase, I now wished I had started
a git branch for the changes to my firefox script - and committed a
few versions so that I would now be able to look back at the history.

You were right - with the seds which are currently in the book.  For
some reason I commented those out.  The patches are technically
correct (accepted upstream, will probably be in 48 but maybe 49) but
the seds are a workaround which does seem to still do the job.

I still need the patch for gtk-3.20 (I build with gtk3 because
upstream have made it the default).

ĸen
-- 
I had to walk fifteen miles to school, barefoot in the snow.  Uphill both ways.
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to