On 20 May 2017 at 17:37, Richard Melville <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 20 May 2017 at 15:15, akhiezer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > From: LM <[email protected]> >> > Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 09:40:01 -0400 >> >> >> (( - was looking again t'other day at the links you included in recent >> lfs-chat posts. Your work is interesting. >> )) >> >> >> > >> > Forgot to mention, if you're just looking for a graphical web browser >> > that will without X, you could also try D+ (Dillo fork) or Netrider >> > (webkit based browser). Both work in framebuffer mode using nano-x. >> > Both were used in the nanolinux distribution ( >> > https://sourceforge.net/projects/nanolinux/ ) which doesn't use X >> > Windows. >> >> >> I'd suggest also netsurf; first used it in riscos on rpi, and now also >> in X-less linux - as one of shortlist of browsers used. >> > > OK, Netsurf does look incredibly interesting, and extremely configurable. > It's also an ongoing project with seemingly plenty of support. If I've the > time soon I'll have a closer look, but currently I'm probably going to run > with Links + SVGAlib. Maybe it's something that could be added to the > book. Do you have any further comments or feedback on it? I'll line it up > for testing on my next build. > I've found the Netsurf GTK version in the Linux Mint repo on an old laptop. It's certainly fast, but, as a test I pointed it at the BBC website as there is an image of this on the netsurf website. It's not rendering nearly as well as shown. Mind you, I seem to have an old version, 2.9.2. Richard
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
