On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:33:35 +0200 Pierre Labastie via blfs-support <[email protected]> wrote:
> Because the piece of code (lines 18 to 23 intest/CMakeLists.txt) which > generates the error seems to not have been changed in 0.69? But, maybe it > is upstream job to try to debug this... Yeah, the problematic code is the same from 0.63 to 0.69. However, IMHO, we don't yet have enough info to file a report upstream. Once I see how g++ is being called differently between 0.62 and 0.63 then I can get a better idea of what exactly is going wrong - mostly likely a duplication in the include paths. I then plan to report this issue upstream. The main unresolved problem is that I still don't see what is different about rhubarbpieguy's system - why does he run into this problem while no one else seems to? The mostly likely candidiate here was the setting of $CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH, but it seems that is not the case. Mike -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
