Pretty ironic you mocked my thread for lacking info on this very issue when ibus wouldn't build. All the info is there to overcome this issue and downgrading isn't the right way.
________________________________ for you to overcome this issue From: blfs-support <[email protected]> on behalf of Trent via blfs-support <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 10:59 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: Trent <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] meson should be downgraded On 11/15/19 7:18 AM, Christopher Gregory via blfs-support wrote: > Hello, > > The added sed to dconf for meson 52 is WRONG, as it breaks the build of dconf > editor and also breaks the build of gnome-terminal. The correct solution at > the moment is to downgrade meson, and yet that solution has not been made > here, as Douglas alreay knows that this is the correct way to do so for now, > as evidenced in this thread: > > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/dconf/issues/59 > > Why did I have to waste so much time, when the person editing the book was > told by the developer that the sed would break things? > > This works fine with the previous version of meson. > > Christopher. Which "book" would that be? Looking at systemd stable, I see they are using Meson 51.1 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/meson.html Though in development, they are using 52 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/systemd/chapter06/meson.html Trent -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
