Well, if this is true, this is possibly a good reason, but 99.9% of the 
internet is not out there to accommodate the blind. I would rather have the 
most accurate and relevant content than content that is primarily text based 
or whatever criteria they are using to present information to me. In other 
words, I don't want a little yellow bus when it comes to the internet, I 
want the same information as everyone else. By accepting the accessible site 
you are allowing Google to state: look at how great we are, we've created a 
place where blind people can enjoy the internet too." This might have some 
truth to it, but it is also a loop hole in terms of responsibility to us 
all. Believe me, you don't want tech support replies to begin with "please 
use our accessibility links." On the other hand, the little yellow bus seems 
to be the philosophy of a great many blind people and unfortunately I don't 
see this ever changing. Sorry Jacob, this is not directed at you, its just a 
current frustration of mine.
Andre
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jacob Kruger" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Blind-Computing] GOOGLE HAS CHANGED AND NOT BETTER FOR 
THEBLIND


Remember also that the accessible version ranks search results slightly
differently AFAIK, in terms of their own cleanliness/accessibility, and
that's also another reason why I prefer it.

Stay well

Jacob Kruger
Blind Biker
Skype: BlindZA
'...fate had broken his body, but not his spirit...'

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andre Williams" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Blind-Computing] GOOGLE HAS CHANGED AND NOT BETTER FOR
THEBLIND


> Out of curiosity. What has changed with Google? I use the regular site and
> have not experienced any problems whatsoever.
> On the Google HomePage you can hit enter on search settings and make your
> adjustments.
> Andre
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "ROSEMARIE CHAVARRIA" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Blind-Computing] GOOGLE HAS CHANGED AND NOT BETTER FOR
> THEBLIND
>
>
> Hi, Heather,
>
> I also use the google accessible site and it works really great for me. I
> also notice that the google site has changed and it's not as good as it
> used
> to be. That's why I switched to the google accessible site.
>
> Rosemarie
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "heather kd5cbl" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 5:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Blind-Computing] GOOGLE HAS CHANGED AND NOT BETTER FOR
> THEBLIND
>
>
>>I have had no issues, I use:http://labs.google.com/accessible/.  So which
>> site are you using that causes problems?
>>
>>
>> For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
>> http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3255 - Release Date: 11/13/10
> 19:34:00
>
>
> For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
> http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
>
>
> For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
> http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 5622 (20101115) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5622 (20101115) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com




For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/ 


For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/

Reply via email to