We have been setting the temperature back at night for two winters now. I can't 
say what the saving is, gets complicated because they keep messing with the 
rates and I haven't tried working out the cubic metre usage. My house though is 
well insulated double wall with R12 on the inside walls and R20 on the outside 
walls with a vapor barrier sealed between. even at minus 40 the house looses 
only about 3 degrees by morning and we sleep with the bedroom window partially 
open but the bedroom door closed. I think that using resistive heating to 
supplement pump heating to raise the temperature in the morning would reduce 
the economy but not by all that much unless it runs for a very long time.

We set back from 22C in the day to 16C at night, I very much doubt the furnace 
comes on but even if it did cycle a couple of times in that 8 hours or so it 
isn't much. It does work a little in the morning to bring the air up and of 
course the ambient mass must also warm up. With luck though we get a little 
sunshine around quarter to nine to help with that.

Dale Leavens, Cochrane Ontario Canada
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype DaleLeavens
Come and meet Aurora, Nakita and Nanook at our polar bear habitat.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: chiliblindman 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 8:19 PM
  Subject: [BlindHandyMan] saving on setback of temp


  Scott, for every 5 degrees you set your temp back, the savings used to be 
around 10 per cent for a 8 hour period.. Bring the temp back up, and half your 
savings are gone. If you figure on only getting 5 per cent savings, it hardly 
seems worth while.
  During an extra hot summer month my cooling cost might be 60 bucks for a long 
month. During a very cold winter month my heating cost can go 250 to 400 bucks. 
Heating cost is always much more than cooling cost. If the average temp for a 
month is above 25 degrees my heating bill will be less than 100 bucks. 
........................bob

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to