if the antenna idea would work I think that's a great alternative.




On Thu, 28 May 2009, Ron Yearns wrote:

> No, as Tom was saying the output of the converter is on channel 3 or 4, like 
> a vhs tape player recorder is or was.  You would have to tune your radio tho 
> that channel, leave it there and  tune the new digital   tv stations with the 
> converter box.
> Ron
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Spiro
>  To: [email protected]
>  Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:31 PM
>  Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Analog TV bands on Radio
>
>
>
>
>
>  only if the radio is able to decode uhf, for if it is a 3-13 channel TV
>  radio; it won't know what to do with the signal, right?
>
>  On Thu, 28 May 2009, Ron Yearns wrote:
>
>  > From what I have been told the V H F t v stations will no longer broadcast 
> anything on those frequencies. Their didigtaal signal will be in the U H F 
> band. They may continue to call themselves channel 4 or 5 or such but will 
> actually be broadcasting on a u h f channel.. If your radio has a coax 
> connector to a antenna now you could get one of the converter boxes and hook 
> it up. Or itf your radio has any provisions for a external antenna some form 
> of adapter with a converter box could work.
>  > Ron
>  > ----- Original Message -----
>  > From: Dave Mitchell
>  > To: [email protected]
>  > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:58 AM
>  > Subject: [BlindHandyMan] Analog TV bands on Radio
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Greetings All: If I understand the situation correctly , soon the analog 
> TV bands on my radios will lose their accessibility due to the forthcoming 
> switch to TV all digital broadcasts.
>  > If this is correct as stated, is their a gadget or work-around that would 
> continue to give me access to this TV band after the transition to the 
> digital broadcasts?
>  > Thanks for the education, Mitch
>  >
>  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

Reply via email to