LGTM2.

-mike


On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:37 AM Mike Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey Mustaq - welcome back. :)
>
> Thanks for the answers, and for requesting the missing WebKit position.
>
> LGTM1
>
> On 5/9/22 5:04 PM, Mustaq Ahmed wrote:
>
> Hi Mike:
>
> Sorry for the delay due to vacation etc!  Below are my answers to your
> queries.  Note that we are still asking for M103, so we will be prompt now
> :)
>
> > Does this only work for standard requestFullscreen, or will it work for
> webkitRequestFullscreen as well?
>
> This covers all forms: we are proposing changes in the core algorithm for
> request-fullscreen, regardless of the JS interface used to call it.
>
> >> Gecko: Positive (
> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/565, also see:
> https://github.com/WICG/capability-delegation/issues/10)
> > I don't think these quite count as official Positive signals (but yes,
> the comments from Anne are promising!). Can we ping the standards-position
> issue and ask for one?
>
> See the recent comments in the issue asking for Gecko's position, thanks.
> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/565
>
> >> WebKit: No signal
> > Have we asked? I looked at the Payment Request, and it seems like we
> didn't, but maybe I'm looking in the wrong spot. If not, can we?
>
> I missed this with the intent for payment, sorry!  Filed a single request
> to cover both payment and fullscreen capabilities:
> https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2022-May/032221.html
>
> >> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests?
> >> Not yet
> > Is there something missing to test this (or capability detection in
> general), or is it just that you haven't written the WPTs yet?
>
> We hadn't written a WPT at that time.  We have one under review now:
> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/34004
>
> Mustaq
>
>
> On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 11:07 PM Ajay Rahatekar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> +Ajay Rahatekar
>>
>> On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 12:29:29 PM UTC-7 [email protected]
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mustaq,
>>>
>>> On 4/21/22 11:05 AM, Mustaq Ahmed wrote:
>>>
>>> Contact emails
>>>
>>> [email protected], [email protected]
>>> Explainer
>>>
>>> https://github.com/WICG/capability-delegation
>>> Specification
>>>
>>> https://wicg.github.io/capability-delegation/spec.html
>>>
>>> (Work in progress for fullscreen algorithm change:
>>> https://github.com/WICG/capability-delegation/pull/28)
>>> Design doc
>>>
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ax54Lf2W3_TovVOj35duKTbcOlXe-nJ-KQdWiy1Ye0c
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> This feature is based on the general delegation mechanism (
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5708770829139968) shipped on M100.
>>>
>>> Fullscreen Capability Delegation allows a Window to transfer the ability
>>> to call requestFullscreen() to another Window it trusts after relinquishing
>>> the transient user activation at the sender Window.
>>>
>>> Does this only work for standard requestFullscreen, or will it work for
>>> webkitRequestFullscreen as well?
>>>
>>> Blink component
>>>
>>> Blink>Fullscreen
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EFullscreen>
>>> TAG review
>>>
>>> Covered by the review for the general delegation mechanism:
>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/655
>>> TAG review status
>>>
>>> Covered by the approval for the general delegation mechanism:
>>> https://github.com/WICG/capability-delegation/pull/23
>>> Risks
>>>
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility risks remain unchanged from the
>>> general delegation mechanism; see that intent here:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/PHT_2X7oRBE/m/gR9UiZxBAQAJ
>>> External signals
>>>
>>> Gecko: Positive (
>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/565, also see:
>>> https://github.com/WICG/capability-delegation/issues/10)
>>>
>>> I don't think these quite count as official Positive signals (but yes,
>>> the comments from Anne are promising!). Can we ping the standards-position
>>> issue and ask for one?
>>>
>>> WebKit: No signal
>>>
>>> Have we asked? I looked at the Payment Request, and it seems like we
>>> didn't, but maybe I'm looking in the wrong spot. If not, can we?
>>>
>>> Web developers: Positive (https://crbug.com/931966#c5)
>>> Debuggability
>>>
>>> This remains unchanged from the general intent:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/PHT_2X7oRBE/m/gR9UiZxBAQAJ
>>> Ongoing technical constraints
>>>
>>> None.
>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>>> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>>
>>> Yes
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Not yet
>>>
>>> Is there something missing to test this (or capability detection in
>>> general), or is it just that you haven't written the WPTs yet?
>>>
>>> Flag name
>>>
>>> --enable-blink-features=CapabilityDelegationFullscreenRequest
>>> Requires code in //chrome?
>>>
>>> Yes, work in progress
>>> Tracking bug
>>>
>>> https://crbug.com/1293083
>>> Estimated milestone
>>>
>>> 103
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6441688242323456
>>> Links to previous Intent discussions
>>>
>>> Intents for the general delegation mechanism:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    I2P:
>>>    
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/9CeLYndESPE/m/AhEttheMBQAJ
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    I2E (with Payment Request):
>>>    
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/i6pAWsjU7zg/m/UK0lGnKuAAAJ
>>>
>>> I2S (with Payment Request):
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/PHT_2X7oRBE/m/gR9UiZxBAQAJ
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO63mt3wbrDHhy7ieb4yAwd0YNhmQM11Mdg3eXfhpt558g%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO63mt3wbrDHhy7ieb4yAwd0YNhmQM11Mdg3eXfhpt558g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/f4a6af83-56b0-f390-10d0-be7cd9d12780%40chromium.org
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/f4a6af83-56b0-f390-10d0-be7cd9d12780%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXHy%3DeSAWS83NVoHJUhn2pAViA8pMogmcx5CcBWHvL2BHeY6A%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to