LGTM3

On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 5:12 AM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org> wrote:

> LGTM2
>
> On 6/16/22 9:42 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote:
>
> LGTM1 to ship this without waiting on TAG feedback. Please add a feature
> flag just in case, and follow up on any TAG feedback in future milestones.
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 9:27 AM Elad Alon <elada...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Blink owners,
>>
>> I am working to align getDisplayMedia() and the Extension API, to the
>> point that deprecating the Hangouts Extension would be possible. It's going
>> to be a gradual process with multiple changes required. Shipping this one
>> particular API surface (systemAudio) in the next Chrome release would
>> greatly expedite projected timelines, as it would unblock some other work.
>>
>> I've spoken to Sangwhan (CCed), and it seems like TAG review is expected
>> end-of-July - a significant delay. I am therefore asking that, out of the
>> four intents recently sent, this one intent be approved without waiting for
>> TAG. Wdys?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Elad
>>
>> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 5:47:49 PM UTC+2 sligh...@chromium.org
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Harald and Elad.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 5:19:17 AM UTC-7 Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>>>
>>>> re webrtc trying to skip TAG review ... we were told at one point (a
>>>> few years back, I think) that we were sending too many TAG reviews; I
>>>> believe that at that point, something like 1/3 of the outstanding TAG
>>>> reviews were on relatively small WebRTC features. I guess we scaled back
>>>> too forcefully .... thanks for pointing out the desire to course-correct.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 6:13 PM Alex Russell <sligh...@chromium.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey Elad,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a pretty simple design, and it's great to see the progress
>>>>> here. That said, this group of intents (systemAudio,
>>>>> suppressLocalAudioPlayback, and selfBrowserSurface) would benefit from a
>>>>> joint explainer with considered alternatives outlined. The TAG might not
>>>>> have much to say about small changes, but our process asks teams to *at
>>>>> least *send them an FYI for non-controversial updates so that they
>>>>> can consider how parts fit together in future.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given that the WebRTC group has a history of trying to skip TAG
>>>>> review, it doesn't seem right for this set of features to launch without
>>>>> some intentional design review. Can you file a request with them or get
>>>>> several of the current and former TAG members (Rossen, David, Alice,
>>>>> myself, or Domenic) in the project to review the design directly?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 12:35:24 AM UTC-7 Elad Alon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've set my alarm.
>>>>>> I'll implicitly assume the same period is intended for the other
>>>>>> three intents-to-ship sent at roughly the same time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 9:29 AM Yoav Weiss <yoav...@chromium.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's give them 1 more week to respond.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 9:21 AM Elad Alon <elad...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Okay, will do. (I've also sent a personal email on the day
>>>>>>>> the intent went out.)
>>>>>>>> When shall I ping this thread if no response is received?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 8:30 AM Yoav Weiss <yoav...@chromium.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 2:38:53 PM UTC+2 Elad Alon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Contact emails elad...@chromium.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Explainer
>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q3oGy7hLJmdQA4ZK7QG7DnwgtcpL6oB2pqLQJ6MP1tY/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Specification
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-screen-share/pull/222/files
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Summary
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hint indicating to the user agent whether the application, upon
>>>>>>>>>> calling getDisplayMedia() with {audio: true} or similar, wishes 
>>>>>>>>>> *system
>>>>>>>>>> audio* to be offered to the user. (If not - only offer tab-audio.)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Blink component Blink
>>>>>>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> TAG review N/A. This is just an addition of a single flag to an
>>>>>>>>>> existing dictionary, following well-known patterns.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> TAG review status Not applicable
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Risks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility *Gecko*: Positive (
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/638)
>>>>>>>>>> Jan-Ivar Bruaroey from Mozilla, and Youenn Fablet from Apple, have 
>>>>>>>>>> both
>>>>>>>>>> collaborated with us closely in shaping this PR. They have then 
>>>>>>>>>> approved
>>>>>>>>>> merging this PR into w3c/mediacapture-screen-share. This is implicit
>>>>>>>>>> support, so I'd consider it POSITIVE even though, as of the time of 
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>> writing, the official request for position has not yet been answered.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *WebKit*: Positive (
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2022-May/032247.html)
>>>>>>>>>> Jan-Ivar Bruaroey from Mozilla, and Youenn Fablet from Apple, have 
>>>>>>>>>> both
>>>>>>>>>> collaborated with us closely in shaping this PR. They have then 
>>>>>>>>>> approved
>>>>>>>>>> merging this PR into w3c/mediacapture-screen-share. This is implicit
>>>>>>>>>> support, so I'd consider it POSITIVE even though, as of the time of 
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>> writing, the official request for position has not yet been answered.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> While encouraging, neither counts as a positive position based on
>>>>>>>>> https://bit.ly/blink-signals
>>>>>>>>> It might be good to give them a few more days to chime in.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Web developers*: Positive Endorsed by Google Meet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Security
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This feature can only be used by Web applications to REDUCE the
>>>>>>>>>> amount of private information they obtain from the user. As such, 
>>>>>>>>>> this is a
>>>>>>>>>> net security gain.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> N/A
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms
>>>>>>>>>> (Windows, Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>>>>>>>>> No. Supported on all platforms that support getDisplayMedia.
>>>>>>>>>> (Namely, all desktop platforms.)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>>>>>>> ? No
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tracking bug
>>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1329129
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No milestones specified
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/4649448880734208
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Links to previous Intent discussions Intent to prototype:
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/zUJh3aXAC3k
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>>
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/1dc008bf-e1f9-4d73-8b29-287cbf2e6f1fn%40chromium.org
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/1dc008bf-e1f9-4d73-8b29-287cbf2e6f1fn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfVEKUw%2B2zWkjFQv1oNbyniUu0hFtHcWzY%3DkpAXoqWH37A%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfVEKUw%2B2zWkjFQv1oNbyniUu0hFtHcWzY%3DkpAXoqWH37A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4c6480fc-4f2b-6c66-0cda-ee54d32d0d29%40chromium.org
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4c6480fc-4f2b-6c66-0cda-ee54d32d0d29%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw_nO-HJh7ePkzLu7aSPH4UwzYNm8g3EDkVPY6bwbgunDA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to