Thanks for the work you've put in through security and privacy review on
this feature. It's an important step towards our ability to remove
third-party cookie access, and I'm looking forward to seeing it used more
widely in the future as we continue down that path. That said, I have a few
thoughts:

1.  I'd be happier if we'd been able to keep the `__Host-`-like
restrictions on `Domain` and `Path` (even if not the prefix); that seems
like a missed opportunity, given that we're going to need to support CHIPS
into the indefinite future. The patch removing these requirements (
https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/pull/46) references discussion on a
PrivacyCG(?) call, but I wasn't able to find minutes. Could you help me
understand the rationale?

2. There are a few issues open against the spec that seem like they ought
to be resolved before shipping. https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/issues/58
, https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/issues/40, and
https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/issues/2 all seem like they would
benefit from explicit resolution. Do you think those ought to be considered
blockers?

-mike


On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:33 PM 'Dylan Cutler' via blink-dev <
blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:

> *Estimated Milestone for Shipping:*
> 109
>
> Apologies, I included the OT milestones instead...
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 4:57 PM Dylan Cutler <dylancut...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Contact emails:
>>
>> dylancut...@google.com, kaustub...@google.com
>>
>> Proposal repository:
>>
>> https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS
>>
>> Design doc:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wL2lCXpaVOi0cWOn_ehfLFIZQxT3t0SH-ANnZYPEB0I/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Specification:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cutler-httpbis-partitioned-cookies/
>>
>> Summary:
>>
>> Given that Chrome plans to deprecate unpartitioned third-party cookies,
>> we want to give developers the ability to use cookies in cross-site
>> contexts that are partitioned by top-level site to meet use cases
>> <https://developer.chrome.com/en/docs/privacy-sandbox/chips/#use-cases>
>> that don't track users cross-site (e.g. SaaS embeds, headless CMS, sandbox
>> domains, etc.). Chrome will introduce a mechanism to opt into having
>> third-party cookies partitioned by top-level site using a new cookie
>> attribute, Partitioned.
>>
>> Since we announced our Intent to Experiment
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/_dJFNJpf91U/m/OXzFi_6wAwAJ?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> with CHIPS, there have been some changes to the API:
>>
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    The Partitioned attribute no longer requires
>>    <https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/pull/46> the __Host- prefix or
>>    its required attributes. The Secure requirement remains.
>>    -
>>
>>    We are changing the per-partition-per-domain limit to be based on the
>>    total size (in bytes) of the cookies set by a domain in a particular
>>    partition in addition to the number of cookies. We intend
>>    <https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/issues/48#issuecomment-1264126065>
>>    to impose a limit of 10 KB per-embedded-site, per-top-level-site and
>>    increase the numeric limit from 10 to 180.
>>    -
>>
>>    For sites embedded in top-level domains that are in a First-Party Set
>>    <https://github.com/WICG/first-party-sets>, their cookies' partition
>>    key will no longer be the owner domain of that set. Rather, the partition
>>    key will always be the top-level domain that the cookie was created on.
>>
>>
>> Blink component:
>>
>> Internals>Network>Cookies
>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Internals%3ENetwork%3ECookies>
>>
>> TAG review:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/654 (Supportive early
>> review)
>>
>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/779 (Oct 19
>> specification review)
>>
>> Risks
>>
>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>
>> Firefox: Positive <https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/#chips>
>>
>> WebKit: Supported incubation
>> <https://github.com/privacycg/proposals/issues/30#issuecomment-1113257336>,
>> Official position pending
>> <https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/50>
>>
>> Web developers: Developers have indicated that CHIPS does solve for many
>> use cases that depend on access to cookies in cross-site contexts (1
>> <https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/issues/8>, 2
>> <https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/issues/30#issuecomment-1104225686>, 3
>> <https://triplelift.com/privacy-hub/w3c-proposals-explained-privacy-with-a-side-of-chips/>).
>> Through incubation, and the Origin Trial, we received feedback to improve
>> ease-of-use, particularly to allow for easier migration of existing systems
>> to use CHIPS. We believe we have satisfactorily resolved these concerns
>> (see changes made listed under Summary section).
>>
>> Other signals:
>>
>> Ergonomics
>>
>> N/A
>>
>>
>> Activation
>>
>> This feature introduces a new cookie attribute, Partitioned, which is
>> opt-in only. Sites which do not set their cookies with Partitioned should
>> not see any change in the browser's behavior when we ship.
>>
>>
>> Security
>>
>> See S&P questionnaire for TAG
>> <https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/blob/main/TAG-S%26P-questionnaire.md>
>>
>>
>> WebView application risks
>>
>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that
>> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>
>> This feature does not deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs. This
>> feature is behind a killswitch.
>>
>>
>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> Is this feature covered by web platform tests?
>>
>> Yes
>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/cookies/partitioned-cookies>
>>
>> Flag name
>>
>> partitioned-cookies
>>
>> Requires code in //chrome?
>>
>> No
>>
>> Tracking bug:
>>
>> https://crbug.com/1225444
>>
>> Non-OSS dependencies
>>
>> Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open
>> source repository and its open-source dependencies to function?
>>
>> Not anymore than cookies already do now.
>>
>> Estimated milestones
>>
>> OriginTrial desktop last
>>
>> 106
>>
>> OriginTrial desktop first
>>
>> 100
>>
>> OriginTrial Android last
>>
>> 106
>>
>> OriginTrial Android first
>>
>> 100
>>
>> Anticipated spec changes
>>
>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>
>> List of open issues: https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/issues
>>
>> Chrome Platform Status page:
>>
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5179189105786880
>>
>> Links to previous Intent discussions
>>
>> Intent to Prototype:
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/hvMJ33kqHRo/
>>
>> Intent to Experiment:
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/_dJFNJpf91U/m/YqP09XbbAgAJ
>>
>> Intent to Extend Experiment:
>>
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/kZRtetS8jsY/m/ppK4kDbqAwAJ
>>
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/MKQODOL0Fso/m/nZXI2dqwAQAJ
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAMCNMFScgacg%3D3ueyRyOtUz4QnoJiYA9BKTryeWp_%2B%3D1Mi6yRg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAMCNMFScgacg%3D3ueyRyOtUz4QnoJiYA9BKTryeWp_%2B%3D1Mi6yRg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXHy%3Dcyb4d07a8PO8LUsSCTR3W2qM_ur43mejN4D_6t2XGc9Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to