LGTM3

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 5:24 AM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:

> LGTM2
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:43 AM Johann Hofmann <johann...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 5:37 PM Chris Harrelson <chris...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 10:34 AM 'Johann Hofmann' via blink-dev <
>>> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Yoav,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 5:28 AM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:57 PM 'Dylan Cutler' via blink-dev <
>>>>> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Contact emails:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dylancut...@google.com, kaustub...@google.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Proposal repository:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Design doc:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wL2lCXpaVOi0cWOn_ehfLFIZQxT3t0SH-ANnZYPEB0I/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Specification:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cutler-httpbis-partitioned-cookies/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you expand on the plans for this I-D? Have y'all talked to the
>>>>> HTTPWG?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, this is being discussed in HTTPWG. Dylan presented CHIPS at IETF
>>>> 115, minutes are here:
>>>> https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf115/minutes.html#cookies
>>>>
>>>
>>> Great. Were there any concerns raised there that might create a risk for
>>> CHIPS?
>>>
>>
>> Not as far as I'm aware of. I couldn't attend the meeting in person, but
>> revisited it with the team. From what I was told the main discussion point
>> was whether we shouldn't just partition all 3P cookies by default instead
>> of giving developers the ability to decide. It's a valid question, but one
>> that has been extensively discussed between browser vendors in Privacy CG,
>> and both Safari and Chrome have made it clear that they strongly prefer
>> blocking 3P cookies by default (with Firefox not being opposed to that).
>> We'll of course keep on engaging with these concerns and questions in
>> HTTPWG, but it seems like a decision that ultimately browsers should have
>> the most authority on.
>>
>> In any case, I don't think that this discussion presents any compat risk
>> for CHIPS, as the Partitioned attribute would be compatible with a
>> hypothetical partition-by-default future (i.e. by being a no-op).
>>
>
> Thanks for the details! :)
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> One important thing to note is that the HTML/Fetch <-> Cookies spec
>>>> interfaces aren't well defined at the moment, which also affects other
>>>> specs that deal with cookie changes such as the Storage Access API. We're
>>>> working on fixing this in a larger effort called "cookie layering"
>>>> <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/2084>, which is
>>>> intended to give Fetch some more responsibility in providing the
>>>> information that is used to select cookies from the cookie store. This way
>>>> we can actually access concepts like "top-level site" at the right
>>>> implementation layer. So, in the mid-term, parts of CHIPS will likely end
>>>> up back in HTML and Fetch.
>>>>
>>>> In the meantime, like for SameSite, the RFC will hand-wave some of the
>>>> browser bits.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Summary:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Given that Chrome plans to deprecate unpartitioned third-party
>>>>>> cookies, we want to give developers the ability to use cookies in
>>>>>> cross-site contexts that are partitioned by top-level site to meet use
>>>>>> cases
>>>>>> <https://developer.chrome.com/en/docs/privacy-sandbox/chips/#use-cases>
>>>>>> that don't track users cross-site (e.g. SaaS embeds, headless CMS, 
>>>>>> sandbox
>>>>>> domains, etc.). Chrome will introduce a mechanism to opt into having
>>>>>> third-party cookies partitioned by top-level site using a new cookie
>>>>>> attribute, Partitioned.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since we announced our Intent to Experiment
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/_dJFNJpf91U/m/OXzFi_6wAwAJ?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> with CHIPS, there have been some changes to the API:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    The Partitioned attribute no longer requires
>>>>>>    <https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/pull/46> the __Host- prefix
>>>>>>    or its required attributes. The Secure requirement remains.
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    We are changing the per-partition-per-domain limit to be based on
>>>>>>    the total size (in bytes) of the cookies set by a domain in a 
>>>>>> particular
>>>>>>    partition in addition to the number of cookies. We intend
>>>>>>    <https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/issues/48#issuecomment-1264126065>
>>>>>>    to impose a limit of 10 KB per-embedded-site, per-top-level-site and
>>>>>>    increase the numeric limit from 10 to 180.
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    For sites embedded in top-level domains that are in a First-Party
>>>>>>    Set <https://github.com/WICG/first-party-sets>, their cookies'
>>>>>>    partition key will no longer be the owner domain of that set. Rather, 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>    partition key will always be the top-level domain that the cookie was
>>>>>>    created on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blink component:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Internals>Network>Cookies
>>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Internals%3ENetwork%3ECookies>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TAG review:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/654 (Supportive
>>>>>> early review)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/779 (Oct 19
>>>>>> specification review)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Risks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Firefox: Positive
>>>>>> <https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/#chips>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WebKit: Supported incubation
>>>>>> <https://github.com/privacycg/proposals/issues/30#issuecomment-1113257336>,
>>>>>> Official position pending
>>>>>> <https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/50>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Web developers: Developers have indicated that CHIPS does solve for
>>>>>> many use cases that depend on access to cookies in cross-site contexts (
>>>>>> 1 <https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/issues/8>, 2
>>>>>> <https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/issues/30#issuecomment-1104225686>,
>>>>>> 3
>>>>>> <https://triplelift.com/privacy-hub/w3c-proposals-explained-privacy-with-a-side-of-chips/>).
>>>>>> Through incubation, and the Origin Trial, we received feedback to improve
>>>>>> ease-of-use, particularly to allow for easier migration of existing 
>>>>>> systems
>>>>>> to use CHIPS. We believe we have satisfactorily resolved these concerns
>>>>>> (see changes made listed under Summary section).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Other signals:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ergonomics
>>>>>>
>>>>>> N/A
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Activation
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This feature introduces a new cookie attribute, Partitioned, which is
>>>>>> opt-in only. Sites which do not set their cookies with Partitioned should
>>>>>> not see any change in the browser's behavior when we ship.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Security
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See S&P questionnaire for TAG
>>>>>> <https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/blob/main/TAG-S%26P-questionnaire.md>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This feature does not deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs.
>>>>>> This feature is behind a killswitch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this feature covered by web platform tests?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/cookies/partitioned-cookies>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Flag name
>>>>>>
>>>>>> partitioned-cookies
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Requires code in //chrome?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tracking bug:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://crbug.com/1225444
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Non-OSS dependencies
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open
>>>>>> source repository and its open-source dependencies to function?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not anymore than cookies already do now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OriginTrial desktop last
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 106
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OriginTrial desktop first
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 100
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OriginTrial Android last
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 106
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OriginTrial Android first
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 100
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat
>>>>>> or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github
>>>>>> issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> List of open issues: https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/issues
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chrome Platform Status page:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5179189105786880
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Links to previous Intent discussions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Intent to Prototype:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/hvMJ33kqHRo/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Intent to Experiment:
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/_dJFNJpf91U/m/YqP09XbbAgAJ
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Intent to Extend Experiment:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/kZRtetS8jsY/m/ppK4kDbqAwAJ
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/MKQODOL0Fso/m/nZXI2dqwAQAJ
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAMCNMFTt9hEnH1%2BBzB6c0qQijbBEJwvUKPKSO2gu7E-A%2BY_v8w%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAMCNMFTt9hEnH1%2BBzB6c0qQijbBEJwvUKPKSO2gu7E-A%2BY_v8w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfUDzq6pUpw_%2BGMBxzrsb23qtw5Vnv-QG6yZQ35G_j%2BZfQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfUDzq6pUpw_%2BGMBxzrsb23qtw5Vnv-QG6yZQ35G_j%2BZfQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAD_OO4gVfT1aAHE4%3D3Cs6KoCA54q14bGaPepuqofdTEKJVkkgw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAD_OO4gVfT1aAHE4%3D3Cs6KoCA54q14bGaPepuqofdTEKJVkkgw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfXOZKtBQPewkukz85JZdT6OXSqLTz8%2BvUZQ6rBaY4hQ3g%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfXOZKtBQPewkukz85JZdT6OXSqLTz8%2BvUZQ6rBaY4hQ3g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY9PCL7SPtyJNoVLpK0X5OA7vzaThN4gCsAL8nqp32AV%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to