Hi Chris:

The other 5 review categories are now green, the last one was marked a few
hours ago.

Please let me know if anything else is needed for the Blink approval
process.  We are targeting M121.

Mustaq



On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 12:07 PM Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> It will be after you click the button to start an API owners review. Also
> don't forget to start the other 5 review categories.
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 9:01 AM Mustaq Ahmed <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris:
>>
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6266812908175360 is the new entry for
>> this feature (because feature type is read-only).  The review bits should
>> now be visible to API Owners, please let know if that's not the case.
>>
>> Mustaq
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 5:03 PM Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mustaq,
>>>
>>> "web developer facing change to existing code" is meant for
>>> "bugfix-level changes to web APIs", which is why it only requires a PSA
>>> (sorry for the confusion - this has been a common issue and the
>>> chromestatus team is working on improved UI to be less confusing).
>>>
>>> In your case you are making a change that adjusts web-exposed behavior
>>> enough that it requires an I2S. So you'll need to update the feature type
>>> and file for all 5 review bits before the API owners can re-review.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 9:30 AM Mustaq Ahmed <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Mike:
>>>>
>>>> Through our offline discussion I learned that for "web developer
>>>> facing change to existing code", the new intent process requires
>>>> merely a "PSA" without (perhaps) any need for additional approvals.  I
>>>> changed the email template subject here from "PSA" to "I2S" only to secure
>>>> "API Owners" approval, finding no obvious way to do it through the
>>>> chromestatus UI!
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, the updated chromestatus entry now seems to say those
>>>> additional approvals are not needed.  Please let me know if I missed
>>>> anything.
>>>>
>>>> Mustaq
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:39 AM Mike Taylor <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Mustaq,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please take a moment to request the other review bits (API OWNERs will
>>>>> wait until those are in progress to begin our review). See
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/bqvB1oap0Yc/m/YlO8DEHgAQAJ
>>>>> for more info.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks!
>>>>> Mike
>>>>> On 10/19/23 3:41 PM, Mustaq Ahmed wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Contact emails [email protected], [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> Specification
>>>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/uievents/#events-mouseevent-event-order
>>>>>
>>>>> Summary
>>>>>
>>>>> After an event target gets removed from the DOM, the logical target of
>>>>> the pointer as implied by the Pointer and Mouse boundary events (i.e. 
>>>>> over,
>>>>> out, enter and leave events) should be the nearest ancestor still attached
>>>>> to the DOM. PEWG has recently reached consensus on this behavior, see
>>>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/380. Chrome has
>>>>> been keeping track of a node even after it gets removed from DOM. As a
>>>>> result, if the pointer moves to a new node B after the hit-test node A is
>>>>> removed from DOM, the boundary event sequence (pointerover, pointerout,
>>>>> pointerenter, pointerleave events and the corresponding mouse events) used
>>>>> to imply a pointer movement from A to B. As per the new consensus, the
>>>>> event sequence should imply a pointer movement from the "parent of A" to 
>>>>> B.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blink component Blink>Input
>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EInput>
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review None
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review status Not applicable
>>>>>
>>>>> Risks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no interop risk because major browsers are currently all
>>>>> slightly different from one another. We are strictly improving the
>>>>> situation through the intent here by having Chrome match an agreed-upon
>>>>> behavior that's already tested (
>>>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/380). The compat
>>>>> risk is negligible for the same reason, existing sites could not rely on
>>>>> the current behavior in all browsers. This is also changing a very narrow
>>>>> use-case.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Gecko*: Positive (
>>>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/380) Mozilla
>>>>> originally called out the interop problem here.
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebKit*: No signal
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web developers*: Positive (https://crbug.com/1147998)
>>>>>
>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>
>>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)? Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>> ? Yes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/pointerevents?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=pointerevent_after_target_appended.html%20or%20pointerevent_after_target_removed.html%20or%20pointerup_after_pointerdown_target_removed.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Flag name on chrome://flags None
>>>>>
>>>>> Finch feature name BoundaryEventDispatchTracksNodeRemoval
>>>>>
>>>>> Requires code in //chrome? False
>>>>>
>>>>> Tracking bug https://crbug.com/1147998
>>>>>
>>>>> Sample links
>>>>> https://output.jsbin.com/yumacid
>>>>>
>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>> Shipping on desktop 121
>>>>> Shipping on Android 121
>>>>> Shipping on WebView 121
>>>>>
>>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>>
>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>> of
>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5182447084109824
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO5zUdYJkRxo5kdVWpFJ%3DB50okhHr0EuWuc-WX9g7BPW0A%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO5zUdYJkRxo5kdVWpFJ%3DB50okhHr0EuWuc-WX9g7BPW0A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO67thtshr2w-dD%3Dy%2B-KoT_r0iKihadFhh-nxZkJDbBWGQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO67thtshr2w-dD%3Dy%2B-KoT_r0iKihadFhh-nxZkJDbBWGQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO6UpuKK%2BJmmdzuh1bu2gU4Cja75Ww4OVXJyuEv306KUmQ%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO6UpuKK%2BJmmdzuh1bu2gU4Cja75Ww4OVXJyuEv306KUmQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO7G07G%3DtLW0ODdR7DOnb9YepB8h%2BpzOJeLst3UQieL%3DfA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to