On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 6:29 AM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org> wrote:

> On 3/14/24 6:29 PM, Stefan Zager wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024, 3:13 PM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/24 1:17 PM, Stefan Zager wrote:
>>
> *WebKit*: No signal
>>
>> Can we request a signal?
>>
>
> It strikes me as odd to request a position on a mature, long since
> published spec, but if you think it's appropriate I will do so.
>
> I think it serves as a good signal that WebKit should prioritize shipping
> here as well, if they'll be the only engine without support - and if they
> have strong feelings as to why something should change before we do ship
> it, now is the time for them to provide that input before it's too late.
>
I opened a webkit standards position issue
<https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/331>.


Presumably this is behind a feature flag, correct?
>>
>
> No it isn't. Again, I didn't think this merited that kind of treatment.
>
> Can you explain why you think this should be exempt, per
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/flag_guarding_guidelines.md
> ?
>
> In the future, you can avoid these kinds of questions if you give a little
> bit more justification. :)
>

Sorry, the process requirements have expanded quite a bit since I last
shipped web-exposed features. I will retrofit a feature flag (CL
<https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5375668>).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAHOQ7J-AJk%2B4kqZ5Ui8AEv_gRJ3vgv9S5W4T5bqtfms1JHPM_A%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to