Hi Mike,

I have updated the chromestatus entry to reflect this.

Thanks,
Akash

On Thursday, November 7, 2024 at 2:18:33 PM UTC-8 Mike Taylor wrote:

> Thank you - can you please update the chromestatus entry "Supported on all 
> platforms?" entry?
> On 11/7/24 4:41 PM, Akash Nadan wrote:
>
> Hi All, 
>
> Slight update to one of the I2S questions:
>
> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
> The attribution reporting feature will be supported on all platforms.
>
> Thanks,
> Akash
>
> On Thursday, November 7, 2024 at 6:51:20 AM UTC-8 Mike Taylor wrote:
>
>> OK - thank you.
>>
>> LGTM1
>> On 11/6/24 5:48 PM, Akash Nadan wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mike, 
>>
>> If a site continues to set the ar_debug cookie, they will still be able 
>> to get the expected debug reporting. They do not need to stop setting it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Akash
>>
>> On Wednesday, November 6, 2024 at 12:25:41 PM UTC-8 Mike Taylor wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 11/6/24 1:28 PM, Nan Lin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> Thanks. Please see the inline response.
>>>
>>> Nan
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 9:24 AM Mike Taylor <mike...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/5/24 5:10 PM, Nan Lin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Mike, 
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the quick response. Please see the inline response.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Nan
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 4:36 PM Mike Taylor <mike...@chromium.org> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 11/5/24 3:30 PM, 'Akash Nadan' via blink-dev wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Contact emails 
>>>>>
>>>>> akash...@google.com, lin...@chromium.org, john...@chromium.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Explainer 
>>>>>
>>>>> Attribution Reporting with event-level reports 
>>>>> <https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/blob/main/EVENT.md>
>>>>>
>>>>> Attribution Reporting API with Aggregatable Reports 
>>>>> <https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/blob/main/AGGREGATE.md>
>>>>>
>>>>> Aggregation Service for the Attribution Reporting API 
>>>>> <https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/blob/main/AGGREGATION_SERVICE_TEE.md>
>>>>>
>>>>> Specification 
>>>>>
>>>>> https://wicg.github.io/attribution-reporting-api/
>>>>>
>>>>> Blink component 
>>>>>
>>>>> Internals > AttributionReporting 
>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Internals%3EAttributionReporting>
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review 
>>>>>
>>>>> Still under review 
>>>>> <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/724> under the 
>>>>> original I2S for the Attribution Reporting API
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review status 
>>>>>
>>>>> Pending
>>>>>
>>>>> Summary 
>>>>>
>>>>> We are landing the following change to the Attribution Reporting API 
>>>>> focused on:
>>>>>
>>>>>    - 
>>>>>    
>>>>>    making it easier to receive API cookie-based debug reports
>>>>>    
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently the API allows cookie-based debug reporting only if 
>>>>> third-party cookies are available AND the API caller sets the special 
>>>>> unpartitioned ar_debug cookie.
>>>>>
>>>>> This change makes it easier for API callers to use the API’s 
>>>>> cookie-based debug reporting by allowing them to receive cookie-based 
>>>>> debug 
>>>>> reports as long as they have third-party cookie accessibility on the 
>>>>> source/destination sites, and they no longer need to actually set the 
>>>>> ar_debug cookie. Third-party cookie accessibility is equivalent to the 
>>>>> API 
>>>>> caller’s ability to set the ar_debug cookie.
>>>>>
>>>>> This change makes it easier for API callers to receive cookie-based 
>>>>> API debug reports (i.e. lower chance of misconfigured ar_debug cookies).
>>>>>
>>>>> Explainer/Spec changes 
>>>>>    
>>>>>    1. 
>>>>>    
>>>>>    Explainer & Spec: 
>>>>>    https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/issues/1440
>>>>>    
>>>>> Can you motivate this change a little more? I'm not seeing developer 
>>>>> feedback in this issue that requiring the ar_debug cookie is a burden - 
>>>>> so 
>>>>> why do we want to make this change now?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In the past, we've heard about feedback on missing debug reports due to 
>>>> misconfigured ar_debug cookie (e.g.  
>>>> https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/issues/1195).
>>>> Therefore, our motivation is to improve utility, and in the meanwhile 
>>>> bring Attribution Reporting API in alignment with Private Aggregation API 
>>>> in terms of debugging behavior.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks - looking at 
>>>> https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/issues/1195#issuecomment-2018709555
>>>>  
>>>> it seems like the developer just misconfigured the debug cookie, right?
>>>>
>>>> So I guess my question is: why did we think requiring this cookie was a 
>>>> good idea in the past, and why do we not believe that now? I agree it is 
>>>> awkward that ARA and PAA don't have similar debug requirements.
>>>>
>>> Yes, the developer misconfigured the debug cookie and therefore didn't 
>>> get debug reporting to work. We've also heard similar feedback on 
>>> misconfigured debug cookies.
>>>
>>> The purpose of the ar_debug cookie requirement was to make it very clear 
>>> that cookie-based debug reporting is tied to whether the reporting origin 
>>> has access to unpartitioned cookies, but it's not really improving privacy.
>>> Removing the requirement would allow us to bring ARA in alignment with 
>>> PAA, and also make it easier for reporting origins to set up cookie-based 
>>> debug reporting while not regressing privacy.
>>> Therefore, we think it's fine to remove the requirement for those 
>>> reasons and base debug reporting on whether reporting origins have the 
>>> capability to access third-party cookies.
>>>
>>> OK - thanks for the responses. One more question: if sites continue to 
>>> send the ar_debug cookie, will they still get the expected debug reporting? 
>>> Or will they need to stop sending it?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Risks
>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>>>>>
>>>>> This is not a fully backwards compatible change. The API caller may 
>>>>> receive more debug reports overall, however this is unlikely because the  
>>>>> API caller can only set the unpartitioned cookie if they have third-party 
>>>>> cookie access and they still have control over whether to enable 
>>>>> cookie-based debug reporting via setting other API fields. Additionally, 
>>>>> this change will not break any pre-existing API integrations or web 
>>>>> functionality.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gecko: No signal (Original request: 
>>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/791)
>>>>>
>>>>> WebKit: No signal (Original request: 
>>>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/180)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> WebView application risks 
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>
>>>>> No
>>>>>
>>>>>               
>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)? 
>>>>>
>>>>> The attribution reporting feature will be supported on all platforms 
>>>>> with the exception of Android WebView
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>> ? 
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Estimated milestones 
>>>>>
>>>>> This feature is anticipated to ship as part of Chrome 132 
>>>>> <https://chromiumdash.appspot.com/schedule>. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>>
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5107034180288512
>>>>>
>>>>> Links to previous Intent discussions 
>>>>>
>>>>> Previous I2S: 
>>>>>
>>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2Rmj5V6FSaY>
>>>>>
>>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M117 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/nWF61c8xu-M/m/uMmH1ewcAQAJ>
>>>>>
>>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M118 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/Mh-mJiyJZFk/m/HlgzpphYBQAJ>
>>>>>
>>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M119 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/6e44SBtEtcQ>
>>>>>
>>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M120 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/jSk3xpNPzGQ/m/VZPsdYgGCAAJ>
>>>>>
>>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M121 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/g9KiC6Rg_mA/m/V679WcWuAQAJ>
>>>>>
>>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M123 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/NE7VGke1Bjc/m/bIX00t4CAAAJ>
>>>>>
>>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M124 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/aregp1li6xk/m/IhBB2z8tBQAJ>
>>>>>
>>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M125 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/9UyhI6SRyxM/m/zgWWckgWAQAJ>
>>>>>
>>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M126 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/7UQR2lPn5KE/m/q_kL6ZiJDgAJ>
>>>>>
>>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M127 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/LAgnyPsJyJg?pli=1>
>>>>>
>>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M128 (1) 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/qlsv7fn0zRE/m/SK8upePCCAAJ>
>>>>>
>>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M128 (2) 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/VKGn41wMYlg/m/VsNXktqvCAAJ>
>>>>>
>>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting feature M130 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/-K2xDYuvmmA/m/Fhp564I7AgAJ>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/dabe5dbd-7c60-4f4f-b355-4f082bb9e62an%40chromium.org
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/dabe5dbd-7c60-4f4f-b355-4f082bb9e62an%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/b271e7ec-b183-41c7-9b5e-41efee533506%40chromium.org
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/b271e7ec-b183-41c7-9b5e-41efee533506%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/c276bbad-5b2a-4771-83e7-42807901b534n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to