On 1/31/25 3:03 PM, Nan Lin wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the response.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 11:00 AM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org>
wrote:
Hey Nan,
On 1/24/25 6:29 PM, Nan Lin wrote:
Contact emails
lin...@chromium.org <mailto:lin...@chromium.org>,
wanderv...@chromium.org <mailto:wanderv...@chromium.org>
Explainer
https://github.com/privacysandbox/tpcd-labeling/blob/main/cookie_deprecation_labeling_explainer.md
<https://github.com/privacysandbox/tpcd-labeling/blob/main/cookie_deprecation_labeling_explainer.md>
https://developer.chrome.com/en/docs/privacy-sandbox/chrome-testing
<https://developer.chrome.com/en/docs/privacy-sandbox/chrome-testing>
Summary
The cookie deprecation labels are useful for developers to
evaluate and optimize deployments of the Privacy Sandbox APIs
prior to any changes in the number of browsers which support
third-party cookies, so we are asking to extend the current set
of labels
<https://developers.google.com/privacy-sandbox/relevance/setup/web/chrome-facilitated-testing>for
three more milestones.
This is a non-standard experiment, so the areas to demonstrate
progress in
https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/#origin-trials
don't cleanly apply. That said, have you received any useful
feedback from developers who are using these labels?
Also, when do you expect this experiment to outlive it's usefulness?
We've heard from developers using the APIs that the current
implementation of labels remains a useful way to coordinate while
there is traffic where Chrome has disabled third-party cookies.
Storage Access Headers
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/gERgwZfN_-E>will
ship in M133, allowing developers to determine if they have
access to unpartitioned cookies via the Sec-Fetch-Storage-Access
header instead of labels. Extending this experiment gives time
for developers to make use of this upcoming API as a signal for
cookie access.
My understanding of this experiment was to allow for A/B testing
analysis - but it sounds like it can be replaced with a signal of
"has 3P cookies" (like navigator.cookieEnabled). Does that fully
satisfy the needs of developers trying to understand PS APIs? Or
do I misunderstand?
The goal of this experiment is to allow ad-techs to run server side
A/B testing from the browser provided treatment and control groups,
and evaluate the impact of third party cookie phase out.
It allows ad-techs to continue to test Privacy Sandbox APIs on some
traffic without population issues.
Thanks - perhaps my question wasn't super clear. Does
Sec-Fetch-Storage-Access fully replace this experiment to allow for A/B
testing by ad tech companies?
Link to “Intent to Experiment” blink-dev discussion
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/0_dR-ffA2LA/m/ZgmMhK-XAQAJ
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/0_dR-ffA2LA/m/ZgmMhK-XAQAJ>
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/3escBQGtIpM/m/ntcytva5BgAJ
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/3escBQGtIpM/m/ntcytva5BgAJ>
https://groups.google.com/u/1/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/v3PiIzm1M-Y
<https://groups.google.com/u/1/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/v3PiIzm1M-Y>
Goals for experimentation
Continued deployment and evaluation of Privacy Sandbox Ads APIs.
Experimental timeline
This feature was previously approved to run up until Chrome 132.
We would like to extend this for Chrome 133 through 135, inclusive.
Any risks when the experiment finishes?
Minimal, the cookie deprecation labels are only available for a
subset of users and must be requested.
Reason this experiment is being extended
We have received feedback that these labels are useful for ad
tech companies to evaluate and optimize the APIs in preparation
for changes to third party cookie availability.
Ongoing technical constraints
None
Will this feature be supported on all five Blink platforms
supported by Origin Trials (Windows, Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, and
Android)?
No, not supported on webview.
Link to entry on the feature dashboard
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5189079788683264
<https://chromestatus.com/feature/5189079788683264>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/849254f2-1020-46d2-b42a-b7dd02db5e85n%40chromium.org
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/849254f2-1020-46d2-b42a-b7dd02db5e85n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/2962090d-6410-4ed5-907c-35eaab159568%40chromium.org.