LGTM2

On Wednesday, February 12, 2025 at 2:59:43 AM UTC+1 Domenic Denicola wrote:

> LGTM1. I'm still curious on the web developer signals, if you have 
> anything to share there :)
>
> >> *Web developers*: No signals
> >
> > I'm just curious, have any web developers complained about this, or is 
> this mostly done out of a desire for interop, or...?
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 1:38 AM Chris Harrelson <chris...@chromium.org> 
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 6:33 PM Domenic Denicola <dome...@chromium.org> 
>> wrote: 
>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>> ? No
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This seems to be testable by checking the relative ordering of 
>>> setTimeout(f,0) and setInterval(g,0), with a test like 
>>> https://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?saved=13477 . 
>>> Maybe you could add one?
>>>
>>
>> Good point. I added a test here 
>> <https://wpt.fyi/results/html/webappapis/timers/setinterval-settimeout-clamping.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned>.
>>  
>> I noted it in the chromestatus entry as well.
>>
>>>  justification None
>>>>
>>>>
>>> A Finch flag seems important for this, just in case it causes compat 
>>> issues.
>>>
>>
>> There is a finch flag (SetIntervalWithoutClamp), my mistake. Edited 
>> chromestatus. 
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/2842e492-ead5-49ab-b02a-62a7c85dd46bn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to