Thanks - I opened https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1205 so hopefully we can have a stable reference for future intents.

On 4/14/25 10:12 AM, Corentin Wallez wrote:
We don't have minutes for these out-of-band meetings, but we want a stable reference that we can point at as well. From talking with the Mozilla engineers working on WebGPU, this would require our API owners to talk with their standard folks to come to some agreement there (though I don't know who that might be so I can't start an email thread).
On Saturday, April 12, 2025 at 1:45:52 AM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote:

    Is there a place to find meeting minutes where Mozilla stated
    this? Agree with Domenic that it would be good to have a stable
    reference.

    On 4/11/25 10:16 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote:
    LGTM2

    On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 7:09 AM Domenic Denicola
    <dom...@chromium.org> wrote:

        LGTM1. Although, it would be good to have a canonical place
        to link to for that Mozilla meta-position, just like you are
        already doing for the WebKit meta-position.

        On Thursday, April 10, 2025 at 1:25:24 AM UTC+9
        fbea...@google.com wrote:

            On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 5:59 PM Daniel Bratell
            <brat...@gmail.com> wrote:

                //

                /

                Gecko: No signal (Mozilla members have requested
                during weekly standardization meetings that we
                postpone filing standard positions until we reach
                Candidate Recommendation (CR) status in Q4.)

                /
                //

                Doesn't this part creates a bit of a chicken-egg
                problem? Or am I misunderstanding the process. Does
                it just mean that Mozilla has delegated all this to
                their WebGPU spec representatives?


            Sorry. it should have said: "Mozilla members have
            requested during weekly standardization meetings that we
            don't file standard positions anymore as we reached
            Candidate Recommendation (CR) status."

                /Daniel

                On 2025-04-02 12:18, 'François Beaufort' via
                blink-dev wrote:


                  Contact emails

                fbea...@google.com


                        Explainer

                Some developers using WebGPU for video effects
                pipelines have proposed allowing a compatible
                GPUTextureView (2D, single subresource) to be used
                in place of a GPUExternalTexture binding. This would
                simplify their shader logic, which currently needs
                to handle both GPUExternalTexture (for source video)
                and GPUTextureView (for intermediate processing) and
                reduce the need to dynamically compile shaders
                depending on where the texture comes from.


                https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/pull/5079
                <https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/pull/5079>


                        Specification

                
https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/#ref-for-dom-gpubindgrouplayoutentry-externaltexture%E2%91%A6
                
<https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/#ref-for-dom-gpubindgrouplayoutentry-externaltexture%E2%91%A6>


                        Summary

                Functionality added to the WebGPU spec after its
                first shipment in a browser.

                A GPUTextureView is now allowed to be used for an
                externalTexture binding when creating a GPUBindGroup.


                        Blink component

                Blink>WebGPU
                
<https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EWebGPU>


                        TAG review

                None


                        TAG review status

                Not applicable


                        Risks



                        Interoperability and Compatibility

                This feature has not yet been implemented in any
                browser. It has been approved by the GPU for the Web
                Community Group, with representatives from Chrome,
                Firefox, and Safari. See minutes at
                
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/wiki/GPU-Web-2025-02-19#add-gputextureview-support-to-importexternaltexture-5068
                
<https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/wiki/GPU-Web-2025-02-19#add-gputextureview-support-to-importexternaltexture-5068>and
                
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/wiki/GPU-Web-2025-03-19#allow-using-a-texture-view-for-an-externaltexture-binding-5079
                
<https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/wiki/GPU-Web-2025-03-19#allow-using-a-texture-view-for-an-externaltexture-binding-5079>


                Gecko: No signal (Mozilla members have requested
                during weekly standardization meetings that we
                postpone filing standard positions until we reach
                Candidate Recommendation (CR) status in Q4.)


                WebKit: Positive
                
(https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/294#issuecomment-1877411933
                
<https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/294#issuecomment-1877411933>)


                Web developers: Positive
                (https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/4504
                <https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/4504>)


                Other signals:


                        WebView application risks

                Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of
                existing APIs, such that it has potentially high
                risk for Android WebView-based applications?

                None



                        Debuggability

                None


                        Will this feature be supported on all six
                        Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux,
                        ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?

                No

                All platforms will eventually have support. Will
                immediately be available on Android, Android
                WebView, ChromeOS, Mac, and Windows, since those
                platforms already support WebGPU. Linux is planned
                to have WebGPU support in the future, so this
                feature will become available when WebGPU does.


                        Is this feature fully tested by
                        web-platform-tests
                        
<https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?

                Yes

                WebGPU/WGSL have a conformance test suite
                (https://github.com/gpuweb/cts
                <https://github.com/gpuweb/cts>) that is regularly
                pulled into Chromium and part of the testing of
                Dawn/Tint in Chromium. While the CTS can be embedded
                in WPT, the WebGPU team opted to keep it separate in
                Chromium testing to use a customized harness for
                robustness and performance. All the tests about this
                feature in WebGPU CTS can be found through the below
                links: https://github.com/gpuweb/cts/pull/4304
                <https://github.com/gpuweb/cts/pull/4304>and
                https://github.com/gpuweb/cts/pull/4306
                <https://github.com/gpuweb/cts/pull/4306>


                        Finch feature name

                WebGPU.Enabled:EnabledToggles


                        Requires code in //chrome?

                False


                        Tracking bug

                https://issues.chromium.org/issues/398752857
                <https://issues.chromium.org/issues/398752857>


                        Estimated milestones

                No milestones specified


                        Anticipated spec changes

                Open questions about a feature may be a source of
                future web compat or interop issues. Please list
                open issues (e.g. links to known github issues in
                the project for the feature specification) whose
                resolution may introduce web compat/interop risk
                (e.g., changing to naming or structure of the API in
                a non-backward-compatible way).

                None


                        Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status


                        
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5106732252266496?gate=5112699639562240
                        
<https://chromestatus.com/feature/5106732252266496?gate=5112699639562240>



                This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform
                Status <https://chromestatus.com/>.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed
                to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
                To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
                emails from it, send an email to
                blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
                To view this discussion visit
                
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPpwU5JF6TSbcO1KSF_i70Q5YTRoxc6D6h9hECw9RxD%3DV0erQg%40mail.gmail.com
                
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPpwU5JF6TSbcO1KSF_i70Q5YTRoxc6D6h9hECw9RxD%3DV0erQg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
        it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
        To view this discussion visit
        
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/392b5522-b601-4a1d-9140-2d55ecdbef37n%40chromium.org
        
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/392b5522-b601-4a1d-9140-2d55ecdbef37n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
    To view this discussion visit
    
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSKgQD14rXTiE8qFC8jt3Mwm%3DtCmvY4TPS6ZJKp%2BZaUdNA%40mail.gmail.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSKgQD14rXTiE8qFC8jt3Mwm%3DtCmvY4TPS6ZJKp%2BZaUdNA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/465a88d7-6cf8-4058-8b7f-56080646e473%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to