On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 6:12 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Having style and layout interleaved doesn't prevent us from accounting for
> the time each took separately.
>

To expand on that, the implementation accounts for style and layout being
potentially interleaved and augments the relevant duration of each
accordingly.


>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 6:04 PM Ian Kilpatrick <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Ah I see Emilio gave the same feedback here:
>> https://github.com/w3c/long-animation-frames/pull/30#issuecomment-3819162688
>> can you address this before experimenting?
>>
>
I can reply, sure.


>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 9:02 AM Ian Kilpatrick <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 8:58 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> *Contact emails*
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> *Explainer*
>>>> https://github.com/w3c/long-animation-frames/pull/30#issue-3828859369
>>>>
>>>> *Specification*
>>>> https://github.com/w3c/long-animation-frames/pull/30
>>>>
>>>> *Summary*
>>>> Add `styleDuration`, `forcedStyleDuration`, `layoutDuration` and
>>>> `forcedLayoutDuration` information to the Long Animation Frame API,
>>>> enabling developers to distinguish style and layout times.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Its incorrect to think of style and layout as two separate things now.
>>> They can be interleaved. What's the usecase for separating them out? E.g.
>>> can the API be simplified as a styleLayoutDuration and
>>> forcedStyleLayoutDuration ?
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>>
>>>> *Blink component*
>>>> Blink>PerformanceAPIs
>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EPerformanceAPIs%22>
>>>>
>>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>>> Missing feature
>>>>
>>>> *TAG review*
>>>> *Not yet.*
>>>>
>>>> *TAG review status*
>>>> Pending
>>>>
>>>> *Risks*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>>> *New attributes, so no compatibility risk. In terms of Interop, this
>>>> doesn't increase the interop risk of LoAF, which is currently only shipped
>>>> in Chromium.*
>>>>
>>>> *Gecko*: No signal
>>>>
>>>> *WebKit*: No signal
>>>>
>>>> *Web developers*: Shopify developers need the data these attributes
>>>> expose in order to better understand CSS performance bottlenecks in the
>>>> wild.
>>>>
>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>
>>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>>
>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>> *No.*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Goals for experimentation*
>>>> *See if the API provides the right data that enables developers to
>>>> understand their CSS performance bottlenecks.*
>>>>
>>>> *Ongoing technical constraints*
>>>> *No.*
>>>>
>>>> *Debuggability*
>>>> *Not applicable.*
>>>>
>>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>>> Yes.
>>>>
>>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>>> Yes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>
>>>> *Finch feature name*
>>>> *LongAnimationFrameStyleDuration*
>>>>
>>>> *Non-finch justification*
>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>
>>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>>> False
>>>>
>>>> *Tracking bug*
>>>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/476826067
>>>>
>>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>>>
>>>> M147-M152
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5171478175809536?gate=5452953152520192
>>>>
>>>> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
>>>> Intent to Prototype:
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSJxRuMp6Ha5RVCjzNfsG0Sj96Y%3Dgy9LnxtM%2Brq-S6DEew%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSJ2PJ0dZxYH48PALOSUenSSV7VuZ9CzTHnGd8u_jTKkcg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSJ2PJ0dZxYH48PALOSUenSSV7VuZ9CzTHnGd8u_jTKkcg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohS%2BLC1oouCNDx54CgLH04osL3ij-nM-S3WHVTPrO_GPDQQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to