On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 9:18 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 6:12 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Having style and layout interleaved doesn't prevent us from accounting
>> for the time each took separately.
>>
>
> To expand on that, the implementation accounts for style and layout being
> potentially interleaved and augments the relevant duration of each
> accordingly.
>
>

Where is the implementation for this?


>
>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 6:04 PM Ian Kilpatrick <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ah I see Emilio gave the same feedback here:
>>> https://github.com/w3c/long-animation-frames/pull/30#issuecomment-3819162688
>>> can you address this before experimenting?
>>>
>>
> I can reply, sure.
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 9:02 AM Ian Kilpatrick <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 8:58 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> *Contact emails*
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> *Explainer*
>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/long-animation-frames/pull/30#issue-3828859369
>>>>>
>>>>> *Specification*
>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/long-animation-frames/pull/30
>>>>>
>>>>> *Summary*
>>>>> Add `styleDuration`, `forcedStyleDuration`, `layoutDuration` and
>>>>> `forcedLayoutDuration` information to the Long Animation Frame API,
>>>>> enabling developers to distinguish style and layout times.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Its incorrect to think of style and layout as two separate things now.
>>>> They can be interleaved. What's the usecase for separating them out? E.g.
>>>> can the API be simplified as a styleLayoutDuration and
>>>> forcedStyleLayoutDuration ?
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> *Blink component*
>>>>> Blink>PerformanceAPIs
>>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EPerformanceAPIs%22>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>>>> Missing feature
>>>>>
>>>>> *TAG review*
>>>>> *Not yet.*
>>>>>
>>>>> *TAG review status*
>>>>> Pending
>>>>>
>>>>> *Risks*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>>>> *New attributes, so no compatibility risk. In terms of Interop, this
>>>>> doesn't increase the interop risk of LoAF, which is currently only shipped
>>>>> in Chromium.*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Gecko*: No signal
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebKit*: No signal
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web developers*: Shopify developers need the data these attributes
>>>>> expose in order to better understand CSS performance bottlenecks in the
>>>>> wild.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>> *No.*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Goals for experimentation*
>>>>> *See if the API provides the right data that enables developers to
>>>>> understand their CSS performance bottlenecks.*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Ongoing technical constraints*
>>>>> *No.*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Debuggability*
>>>>> *Not applicable.*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Finch feature name*
>>>>> *LongAnimationFrameStyleDuration*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Non-finch justification*
>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>>>> False
>>>>>
>>>>> *Tracking bug*
>>>>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/476826067
>>>>>
>>>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>>>>
>>>>> M147-M152
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5171478175809536?gate=5452953152520192
>>>>>
>>>>> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
>>>>> Intent to Prototype:
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSJxRuMp6Ha5RVCjzNfsG0Sj96Y%3Dgy9LnxtM%2Brq-S6DEew%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSJ2PJ0dZxYH48PALOSUenSSV7VuZ9CzTHnGd8u_jTKkcg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSJ2PJ0dZxYH48PALOSUenSSV7VuZ9CzTHnGd8u_jTKkcg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAJL3UpQwU%2BgObL41ia%2BtXPTVehTdbMnMVNLRgG%2B-1RrgdvqseQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to