Jonathan Morton <[email protected]> writes: > Looking at the code, HTB is considerably more complex than TBF in > Linux, and not all of the added complexity is due to being classful > (though a lot of it is). It seems that TBF has dire warnings all over > it about having limited packet-rate capacity which depends on the > value of HZ, while HTB has some sort of solution to that problem.
Last I checked, those warnings were out-dated. Everything is in nanosecond resolution now, including TBF. I've been successfully using TBF in my experiments at bandwidths up to 100Mbps (on Intel Core2 x86 boxes, that is). -Toke
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
