>> Judging from that graphic... I don't think huff and puff was designed for >> the bufferbloated era! so the question remains, in hal's tests, did ntp >> adjust the clock backwards? > > No. The system that collected that data was getting time from a good local > GPS clock. It helps to have a place to stand if you want to collect time > data. > > Here is a typical pattern from a system using the pool without any > huff-n-puff while I did a big download. > 8 Jul 22:02:17 ntpd[26705]: 0.0.0.0 061c 0c clock_step -0.259747 s > 8 Jul 23:06:24 ntpd[26705]: 0.0.0.0 061c 0c clock_step +0.274448 s
OK, so, out there, on the billions of machines that dnsmasq runs on, some are crashing when this happens. I don't think I am satisified with the solutions. http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2015q3/009701.html > > > -- > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > > -- Dave Täht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
