Hi Dave,
fun fact, the draft is titled "Identifying and Handling Non Queue Building
Flows in a Bottleneck Link".
To which the _only_ and obvious answer is one does this by by observing
flow-behavior on the element that egresses into the bottleneck link.
Case closed, Nothing to see folks, you can go home... ;)
(I have started to read this thing ages ago and blissfully forgot all about it,
time to read it agian?)
Best Regards
Sebastian
> On Aug 24, 2019, at 16:57, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> I decided that perhaps it would be best if we tried harder
> to live within the ietf's processes for calm, reasoned discussion
>
> But in trying to review this internet draft...
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-white-tsvwg-nqb-02.html
>
> I couldn't help myself, and my review is here:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/hZGjm899t87YZl9JJUOWQq4KBsk
>
> If someone could make something constructive out of that, great. It
> would be good to have a really clear definition of what we mean by
> sparse, and good definition and defense on our website of the properties
> and benefits of fair queueing.
>
> And I'm going to go off today and try to do something nice for a small
> animal, a widow, or an orphan. Maybe plant some flowers.
>
> Some days it doesn't pay to read your accrued inbox messages. Today
> was one of them. You needen't read mine either!
> _______________________________________________
> Ecn-sane mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat