On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 7:55 AM Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > > This review, highly recommending this router on the high end > > https://www.increasebroadbandspeed.co.uk/best-router-2020 > > also states that the sqm implementation has been dumbed down > significantly and can only shape 800Mbit inbound. Long ago we did a > backport of cake to the other ubnt routers mentioned in the review, > has anyone tackled this one?
I take it the answer to this question is... no? For the record I helped do the original fq_codel port to the edgerouter over a weekend back in 2013. the ubnt community jumped all over it, polished up the configuration language to use it, leveraged the sqm spec and demanded the result in their next formal release... which ubnt did. It's been an ever increasing "selling feature" for them ever since. There were like 800 messages on that wonderful 2013 thread, can't find it now. I don't know how closed this hw is, compared to the older edgerouters. I can go hit the ubnt forums to find out. Back then the devkit was freely available. I wouldn't mind getting in there to finally fix frame compensation or integrate cake. > > > -- > "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public > relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman > > [email protected] <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729 -- "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman [email protected] <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729 _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
