> For the record I helped do the original fq_codel port to the
> edgerouter over a weekend back in 2013. the ubnt
> community jumped all over it, polished up the configuration language
> to use it, leveraged the sqm
> spec and demanded the result in their next formal release... which
> ubnt did. It's been an ever
> increasing "selling feature" for them ever since.
>
> There were like 800 messages on that wonderful 2013 thread, can't find it now.
>
> I don't know how closed this hw is, compared to the older edgerouters.
> I can go hit the ubnt
> forums to find out. Back then the devkit was freely available.
>
> I wouldn't mind getting in there to finally fix frame compensation or
> integrate cake.

Shame they haven't been as interested in implementing CAKE in their firmware. 
We haven't reached fq_codel levels of activity for CAKE, but we've still got 
well over 500 replies to that thread. Personally after getting CAKE to work on 
those boxes, I have never looked back. It's just that good.

Last time I saw someone ask about getting CAKE implemented in the stock FW, 
UBNT-staff just sent them my way [1]. 

[1]: 
https://community.ui.com/questions/Cake-SQM-AQM/8da70eda-de9c-46e1-b439-056f1d035350#answer/92c0a3b6-23b8-4140-92f1-4410d5daeb34

Best Regards
Nils
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

Reply via email to