I too like idle and working.

On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 12:42 AM Erik Auerswald
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I, too, think that "idle" and "working" seem to be
> useful terms here.  An alternative to "idle" might
> be "minimum," since this implies that the latency
> is not always at the minimum.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
> On 05.05.21 02:14, James R Cutler wrote:
> > Jason,
> >
> > I find “idle” and “working” to be understandable both individually and as 
> > opposites in almost any field or endeavor. These terms also mesh with 
> > typical speed test instructions regarding testing under idle conditions 
> > without working internet applications.
> >
> >       James
> >
> >> On May 4, 2021, at 7:02 PM, Livingood, Jason via Bloat 
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Like many of you I have been immersed in buffer bloat discussions for many 
> >> years, almost entirely within the technical community. Now that I am 
> >> starting to explain latency & latency under load to internal non-technical 
> >> folks, I have noticed some people don’t really understand “traditional” 
> >> latency vs. latency under load (LUL).
> >>
> >> As a result, I am planning to experiment in some upcoming briefings and 
> >> call traditional latency “idle latency” – a measure of latency conducted 
> >> on an otherwise idle connection. And then try calling LUL either “active 
> >> latency” or perhaps “working latency” (suggested by an external colleague 
> >> – can’t take credit for that one) – to try to communicate it is latency 
> >> when the connection is experiencing normal usage.
> >>
> >> Have any of you here faced similar challenges explaining this to 
> >> non-technical audiences? Have you had any success with alternative terms? 
> >> What do you think of these?
> >>
> >> Thanks for any input,
> >> Jason
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat



-- 
Latest Podcast:
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920/

Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

Reply via email to