David Schinazi via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> My understanding is that Apple chose to report RTT as an inverse because
> people are used to "higher number means better". The target audience
> for
Yes. Stuart was pretty clear about this being the reason for the decision.
It seemed sound then and I still think it's sound.
> network speed tests is the average slightly-tech-savvy consumer, and those
> aren't all familiar with what latency means. Also, car enthusiasts like
Marketing people like bigger numbers.
That's where we want things to go: into advertisements.
(I keep asking for 128-bit internet, because it's better than 32-bit 1980s
crap, but then they answer: "Oh, yes! we have 125Mbs LTE")
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
