OK, as noted in the ticket I tweaked about and then removed the started
state for now. Let me know if you think that the distinction between
accepted and started states really matters.
Cheers,
Gary
On 31/10/12 13:46, Apache Bloodhound wrote:
#194: Examine workflow for Bloodhound site
------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: gjm | Owner: nobody
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: siteadmin | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
------------------------+--------------------
Comment (by gjm):
With use I noted a few missing actions ({{{reopen}}} and {{{failreview}}})
and a few problems with action labels when there is also a potential
change of ownership which should now be corrected. Also the using
{{{started}}} in addition to {{{accepted}}} still felt like a bit too much
of a complication. It is a bit easier to add than take away states (in
some senses anyway) and so I suggest that it is removed, at least
temporarily.
So, this is the new workflow for now:
attachment:new_workflow_current.ini
[[Image(current workflow.png)]]
-- Ticket URL:
<https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/194#comment:14> Apache
Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/> The Apache
Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker
