Your suggestion seems reasonable to me, what stops this from working that way currently?
- Joe On 7 November 2012 06:34, Apache Bloodhound < [email protected]> wrote: > #194: Examine workflow for Bloodhound site > ------------------------+-------------------- > Reporter: gjm | Owner: gjm > Type: task | Status: review > Priority: major | Milestone: > Component: siteadmin | Version: > Resolution: | Keywords: > ------------------------+-------------------- > > Comment (by olemis): > > Recently I noticed some weird transitions while using new workflow . > Sequence was > > 1. #195 put into needsinfo status owner => jdreimann > 2. #195 put into assigned status owner => <empty> > (even if input box = olemis) > 3. #195 put into assigned status owner => olemis > (review action not available :'( ... ) > 4. #195 put into review status owner => jdreimann > > The issue is somewhere between transitions (2) or (3) . I was hoping to be > do it like this > > 1. #195 put into needsinfo status owner => jdreimann > 2. #195 put into assigned status owner => olemis > 3. #195 put into review status owner => jdreimann > > what d'u think ? > > '''PS:''' the same comment has been posted to bh-dev ML ... I just thought > this had to be mentioned here instead ... jftr > > -- > Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/194#comment:17> > Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/> > The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker > -- Joe Dreimann UX Designer | WANdisco <http://www.wandisco.com/> * * *Transform your software development department. Register for a free SVN HealthCheck <http://go.wandisco.com/HealthCheck-Sig.html> *
