On 14 January 2013 14:52, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1/14/13, Apache Bloodhound <[email protected]> wrote:
> > #351: Update versions in setup.py files to 0.4.0 for all bloodhound
> plugins
> > ------------------------+-----------------------
> > Reporter: gjm | Owner: gjm
> > Type: task | Status: closed
> > Priority: major | Milestone: Release 4
> > Component: dashboard | Version:
> > Resolution: fixed | Keywords:
> > ------------------------+-----------------------
> > Changes (by gjm):
> >
> > * status: accepted => closed
> > * resolution: => fixed
> >
> >
> > Comment:
> >
> > r1432848 fixes for dashboard, multiproduct and theme
> >
> > r1432859 fixes for search (apparently a downgrade)
> >
>
> Is TRAC_VERSION file in trunk up to date ?
>
Yes, we have stuck with the 1.0 tagged version for this release although
there is at least one patch that was applied from trunk.
I wonder if we should consider being a little more specific and call the
version 1.0-bhN where N is indicative of the number of versions of
bloodhound with additional changes the trac branch has been through, or
something like that.
Is there a particular reason to move away from 1.0 yet?
Cheers,
Gary
