On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Gary Martin <[email protected]>wrote:
> [...] > I wonder if we should consider being a little more specific and call the > version 1.0-bhN where N is indicative of the number of versions of > bloodhound with additional changes the trac branch has been through, or > something like that. > Some scheme to track patches on the Trac branch seems valuable, particularly if we get more than a few patches and have to manage temporary patches to our Trac branch which will eventually be backed out when those changes work their way back to the Trac core.
