|
Mike, and Renee,
It is such a coincidence to me - uncanny,
really - that I was just discussing Dr. Stanley's honorary doctorate only
recently in an entirely different context that this. I was pointing out when it
is acceptable to actually use the title "Dr." in front of ones name and when it
is not, and I help up Dr. Stanley as probably a premier example of a legitimate
use of the title. He, indeed, has done so much for not only bluegrass, but for
American folk music itself, having stepped into the gap opened by the likes of
Woody Guthrie, Pete Seeger, and Joan Baez, not only carrying on their work, but
legitimizing it and bringing to new heights with his very presence. I realize
that he, of course, was around before any of them (except for Guthrie), but once
they popularized folk music, its attraction faded somewhat soon
thereafter.
Indeed, a friend of mine was talking about
having gone to a bluegrass festival, and what she was describing made it sound
like the whole genre seems to be shifting into a sort of fusion music mold the
way country music in general is, such that the roots of it are being left behind
in favor of commercialism, and if my perceptions are correct in this matter,
then it is all the more important that more focus be given on Dr. Stanley and
all of those who support him and who might carry on his work some time in the
future, if the Lord is willing. For instance, I told my friend that, clearly,
dulcimers have always been a part of Appalachian folk music, but that there
would not be any dulcimers in a traditional bluegrass band. But she said that
all of the bands featured electric dulcimers! That is when I told her that she
should check out the music of the Stanley Brothers and of Dr. Ralph Stanley, to
get an idea of that bluegrass music was really all about, since I know, from a
wonderful documentary I saw on LINK-TV about Dr. Stanley that he has worked hard
to keep the traditional sound alive, and has scorned any new innovations. In any
event, there are plenty of new innovations as it is, and it is refreshing that
at least someone is keeping the "real" music alive!
The discussion that brought Dr. Stanley and
his much deserved doctorate to mind had to do with anti-aspartame activist Betty
Martini, who has embarrassed the rest of the food activism community with her
insistence on calling herself "Dr." Martini after having received an honorary
doctorate from a web based diploma mill run by a very questionable character. In
the course of the discussion, I pointed out to a fellow activist that there was,
indeed, a legitimate use of the title "Dr." before ones name, and I held up Dr.
Ralph Stanley as the best example that I could think of.
By the way, Renee, I am sorry that you may
have taken offense at Mike's question. I hope that you realize now that he
didn't intend any disparagement of Dr. Stanley in that - but thank you so
much for your clarifications anyway, as they were quite
informative.
Bryant Holman
Presidio, Texas
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Smith
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: BG: Re: quich question
|
- BG: quich question Mike Smith
- BG: Re: quich question Renee'
- BG: Re: Re: quich question geneandjanet
- Re: BG: Re: quich question Mike Smith
- Re: BG: Re: quich question-Response to Music ... Doris Bradley
- BG: Re: quick question Renee'
- Re: BG: Re: quich question E Bryant Holman
- BG: Re: Bryant Renee'
- BG: Re: Re: Bryant E Bryant Holman
- BG: Re: Folk Music & Mtn.Blu... Renee'
- RE: BG: Re: Folk Music &... Willie Carter
- BG: Re: Folk Music & Mt... Renee'
- RE: BG: Re: Folk Music &... Willie Carter
- RE: BG: Re: Folk Music &... Gideon Thomas
- Re: BG: Re: Folk Music &... Buddy Woodward
- BG: Re: Folk Music & Mtn... Renee'
- BG: Digestified mailing available fo... Jonathan
