On 6/26/07, Noel O'Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26/06/07, Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/25/07, Noel O'Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What should the discussion be about otherwise? Most of the
> > political/social aspects to the blue obelisk are done via the blogs. I
> > have no problems with a joined list.
>
> I'd like to see the bug reports and feature request updates being sent
> to a mailing list. I'm not sure if the majority of people are
> interested in this.

That would be fine to me.

> Also, I note that you didn't 'cc' this message to the BO list. Is this
> a sign that you also feel that some discussions are too techy for the
> list.

Actually no :) Just that stupid Gmail interface which does not have a
Reply-to-List :(

> > > I assume it's an error that SVN commits are being sent to the CDK
> > > project at CIA rather than to the blueobelisk project. Is this
> > > correct?
> >
> > Yes, because there is no #blueobelisk IRC channel.
>
> So...can I fix this? There's a hook on SF for CIA commit messages. It
> doesn't rely on any IRC magic.

Yes, and the hook is used, correct? But to whereto should the CIA
commit messages go otherwise? Do you plan to set up a #blueobelisk?
(which would be fine... :)

Egon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss

Reply via email to