On Aug 25, 2008, at 3:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> There is no indication in the babel-1.6 source tree that I could find
> to indicate that it is not FOSS.

If you take a look at any source file:
> This file is part of the Babel Program
> Copyright (C) 1992-96 W. Patrick Walters and Matthew T. Stahl
> All Rights Reserved

To me, that pretty much rules out open source.

> It looks like openbabel-2.1.1 is in the package tree, and it would  
> be worth checking out I take it.  In

I'd certainly suggest Open Babel 2.2.0. Trust me, it has a lot of  
fixes over 2.1.1. :-)


This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to