Hi all,

in reply to a recent private, off-line discussion on what the Blue
Obelisk means with 'Open Standard', and what the Open Standards in
chemistry are, I like to ask for clarification.

Right now, the wiki [0] says as requirements:

* redistributable
* well and openly specified

These aim at ensuring that a specification can be fully and
independently implemented.

It also says the being able to modify the specification does not have
to be allowed. And this is where it is quite different from the Open
Source and Open Data ideas. There is something to be said about this,
as standards must not change rapidly, to allow people using the
standard to keep up.

But, the way the wiki now reads seem to approve that the standard may
be developed in a closed community. Is that something the Blue Obelisk
should approve, or should we promote the standard development to be
Open for the community too? The OpenSMILES project certainly is
qualifies as that. The wiki page [0], however, lists a number of
standards, some of which are definitely developed in a Closed
Community, as the wiki indicates itself too. This includes Java and
InChI. CML is listed as Closed Development standard too.

>From my recent discussion, I have to say the singling out of Standards
is rather confusing, and unlike the general ideas the Blue Obelisk
promotes.

Therefore, I like to propose we:

1. make clear what Open Standards are Closed and Open Development
2. we include modifiability in the Open Standards definition

I am quite confident that versioning and naming of standards can
easily overcome incompatibilities, and observe incompatibilities
between other standards and versions too.

Egon

0.http://blueobelisk.sourceforge.net/wiki/Open_Standards


-- 
Post-doc @ Uppsala University
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss

Reply via email to