If you are using "Standards" in a formal sense then there are very few in our area. NO chemistry specifications are standards. W3C protocols (XML, HTML, CSS) are not standards, they are "recommendations" IETF does not produce standards but drafts (e.g. MIME, URIs) The only standards are those that go through ISO (none in chemistry that matter) or ECMA. Things like Javascript, MS-OOXML (yes). Not Java.
So we have to use a looser definition of standard. It's in our mantra. I think we should define what we regard as useful, not what is formally a "standard". -- Peter Murray-Rust Reader in Molecular Informatics Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry University of Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK +44-1223-763069
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
