On 07/07/10 15:12, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote: >> A company COMP wishes to use LIB in its products in a statically linked >> manner >> and asserts that this is not possible with LGPL code. > Their assertion is incorrect.
While formally this is true, I didn't take it to be strict in the sense that you seem to have done, I thought that "this is not possible" meant that "management does not allow it", i.e. internally, it is "not possible" - which could well be the case. > The LGPL does not "know" of any difference between static linking and > dynamic linking. In either method, the code "mixes" on the binary level. Agreed. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
