I noticed that the review http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2016.07.008 did not include mention of Chem4Word, noteworthy because V 2 has recently been released; https://chem4word.codeplex.com as opensource.
From: Peter Murray-Rust <pm...@cam.ac.uk> Date: Friday, 19 August 2016 at 08:36 To: Geoffrey Hutchison <geo...@pitt.edu> Cc: BlueObelisk-Discuss <blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>, "ga...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk" <ga...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [BlueObelisk-discuss] Software for ligands Thanks everyone - and keep suggestions coming. On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Geoffrey Hutchison <geo...@pitt.edu<mailto:geo...@pitt.edu>> wrote: > I have suggested that there are Open tools that they may not yet have > discovered. They have needs for (at least): > * 2-D chemical editor and display I do not think such a thing currently exists. The ChemDoodle tool, while not open, is at least low cost, and they do support open source web components (http://web.chemdoodle.com/) This is a sorely lacking area. It might be useful to categorize those areas where more effort would be valuable. Did John May put effort into JChempaint - what I saw was certainly improved from when I last visited it. Is it a useful tool, being used? And if not is it capable of being developed. It's a pity that JME is not open - after about 20 years. Graphics libraries have improved - a good MSc student could develop an editor - should we have a wish list that could be distributed? -- Peter Murray-Rust Reader in Molecular Informatics Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry University of Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK +44-1223-763069
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list Blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
