Hi Dirk, > PHP and apache > > I am a big friend of mod_ruid2. It is similarly fast as PHP-FPM (suphp is > incredibly slow) and directives via the .htaccess work. > The .htaccess is ignored by PHP-FPM, which is no help especially with > .htaccess directory protection. > I don't need the DSO implementation. But DSO+mod_ruid2 is really helpful and > it would be good if you could keep that.
I'm also leaning to retaining PHP as is and to ditch HTTP/2 for Apache. On the other hand I don't want to deviate that far from what's becomming or alreadey is the new standard. If PHP isn't kept as is, then Easy-Migrate will have to convert DSO and DSO+mod_ruid2 to something else on import. Which adds another layer of complexity. So I think I'll have to actually both: Make it configureable if Apache is allowed to use HTTP/2 and if it is, disable DSO and DSO+mod_ruid2 *and* do a conversion of Vsites that already use DSO related PHP to something that will still work. Likewise: Easy-Migrate will need the conversion provisions for PHP if HTTP/2 is enabled on 5211R. And I think I make it a default that HTTP/2 is disabled, so that we can use DSO + DSO+mod_ruid2 and the user will have the choice to enable HTTP/2 if wanted to. That way we retain the whole tool-box and also retain previous functionality and expected behavior. > Don't you have the possibility to report bugs to RHEL? Or give the > information to Almalinux? Sure, you can report issues to RedHat via the maze of their website. However, whenever I try, the page loads and where the content is supposed to be I get a spinning circle. Not sure what the issue is, but on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS I'm not able to file any bugs with RedHat, regardless which browser I use. :o/ > I can't yet find anything about version 9 on either the Almalinux or Rocky > Linux pages. > I'm curious to see how long it will take after the RedHat release. I'm sure they're on it and I wouldn't be surprised if the AlmaLinux guys have something within days after the release or RHEL9. > What I would also like to bring up again in this context is this: > https://almalinux.org/elevate > So the possibility of porting CentOS7 to AlmalInux 8, or presumably then > Almalinux 8 to 9. > Even though there is easy migrate and it works really well 90%+ of the time, > I would find an upgrade from 8 to 9 really helpful. I'll eventually look at it, but it probably won't be available yet when 5211R comes out. > From 7 to 8 or 9 probably won't work, because with the upcoming of jails for > ssh you have modified the directory structure very strongly. That's correct. > Oh, and just as an aside. > Maybe the new template will finally get a chance in this context? That's much more likely now than it happening for 5210R first. -- With best regards Michael Stauber _______________________________________________ Blueonyx mailing list Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
