On Aug 26, 12:45 am, "Christian Montoya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Glenn Rempe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Since the bugs have been migrated to lighthouse, and the code is in
> > git, should we leave the pointer I wrote up on the home page of google
> > code in place, or should we just go ahead and delete the project there
> > altogether?
>
> >http://code.google.com/p/blueprintcss/
>
> We should keep it up, just empty it out, because a lot of blogs and
> articles link directly to this address.
>
Are you saying you are going to drop the subversion repo of blueprint
@ Google Code? I work with the Habari ( http://habariproject.org/en/
)project, and we use the blueprint framework in our admin interface
(kinda), and include it the download for theme developers to access as
well.
We use an svn:external pointing to the .7 tag. If you delete the
project, that would break our trunk so to speak.
If you could leave the GC project up until we figure out what to do,
that would be great.
~miklb
> --
> --
> Christian Montoya
> christianmontoya.net
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Blueprint CSS" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
