dbarton == gbarton He's the only non-NIC employee, I will reach out to the others. I kinda understand why we would need iCLA's from the people that have committed, but technically gbarton has not committed. I committed his patch, git can have a different committer from author. I'm ok with getting an iCLA from these people if it's necessary, but they committed code to Blur before it was Apache. I have excepted gbarton's code after it was Apache, but he doesn't have committer status on the github project. If we need him to fill out a iCLA, I feel like he should be made a committer or is the iClA needed if you contribute as well? The reason I ask is because my code has been excepted into other Apache projects without iCLA on record.
Aaron On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Tim Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Tim Williams <[email protected]> wrote: >> Our repo is almost ready - we need to approve it before infra flips >> the read-only bit. It seems that it's a dated snapshot so not sure >> if it'd be easier to ask him to reclone it or just re-apply the >> latest patches? Aaron, you're prolly best positioned to give David an >> answer on this:) >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5125 > > It looks like there have been pulls/commits from folks not covered by > an iCLA so I reckon we need to figure out what to do about that. I > see: > > sleberknight - safe to assume this is Scott and covered by his iCLA:) > bmarcaur - commit that post-dates the NIC software grant (7/27/2012) > but don't see an ICLA > dbarton - not sure, not enough to look for an ICLA? > Tom - not sure, not enough to look for an ICLA? > > I don't have experience in a situation like this - so I'm > conservatively asserting that we'd need an ICLA from these folks, but > maybe a fellow mentor can help out? Since the contributions were made > after the initial Software Grant and through a non-Apache mechanism... > > Thanks, > --tim
