On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Garrett Barton <[email protected]> wrote: > Guys I'll sign the Icla (this it? > http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt) to clear any potential > worries up. Honestly didn't even know about it till this email chain. > How would I get it to y'all?
Hey Garrett, Yeah, if you plan to continue contributing, it'd be good to sign/scan and send it in.. http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#cla Thanks, --tim > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ok I'm sorry I misunderstood. If needed I would think that we can get >> icla's from the nic people. As far as gbarton, he sent a pull request via >> github and commented about it on the issue in jira. That's the only record >> of intent to contribute the code. >> >> Aaron >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Aug 31, 2012, at 7:55 PM, Tim Williams <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Just to be clear, I want this completed so we can move on. So the >>>> question is do I need to get iCLA's from everyone that has ever >>>> committed / contributed code to blur? When if they are not committers >>>> in the Apache project? Let me know what you want me to do. >>> >>> To be clear, my question isn't holding *anything* up - it's just a >>> question. We can proceed as usual - incubation is about sorting out >>> these issues and frankly, I'm just not sure exactly how this one >>> should be handled. >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> dbarton == gbarton >>>>> >>>>> He's the only non-NIC employee, I will reach out to the others. I >>>>> kinda understand why we would need iCLA's from the people that have >>>>> committed, but technically gbarton has not committed. I committed his >>>>> patch, git can have a different committer from author. I'm ok with >>>>> getting an iCLA from these people if it's necessary, but they >>>>> committed code to Blur before it was Apache. I have excepted >>>>> gbarton's code after it was Apache, but he doesn't have committer >>>>> status on the github project. If we need him to fill out a iCLA, I >>>>> feel like he should be made a committer or is the iClA needed if you >>>>> contribute as well? The reason I ask is because my code has been >>>>> excepted into other Apache projects without iCLA on record. >>> >>> Since Blur was ALv2 before bringing it here maybe section 5 of the >>> license is enough. I don't know, I'm hoping another mentor will help >>> out here. Personally, I think it'd be good to get some >>> acknowledgement that they intended to contribute it. >>> >>> Your previous patches have been accepted by other projects likely >>> because of the "checkbox" that indicated your intent to contribute >>> them. That checkbox was wildly misunderstood, likely unnecessary >>> [because of Section 5 I mention above] and recently removed. In any >>> case, this shouldn't slow things down at all, just a question... >>> >>> Thanks, >>> --tim
