[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13577623#comment-13577623
 ] 

Gagan Deep Juneja commented on BLUR-49:
---------------------------------------

Thanks Aaron for writing the example. So as per example the patch I have 
provided you is good to go. 
Please let me know if we need any change.

But the way we have written code to invoke javascript function there is a 
restriction that the javascript function name must be "initAnalyzer" is that 
fine? or we should need to generalize this?

Regards,
Gagan
                
> BlurAnalyzer add constructor arguments
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BLUR-49
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-49
>             Project: Apache Blur
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.2.0
>            Reporter: Aaron McCurry
>             Fix For: 0.2.0
>
>         Attachments: 
> 0001-BLUR-ID-49-Added-Javascript-method-call-to-intialize.patch, 
> 0001-BLUR-ID-49-Blur-Analyzer-Added-constructor-arguments.patch
>
>
> In the 0.2-dev branch, the BlurAnalyzer should be enhanced to allow 
> constructor arguments to be passed in the ClassDefinition.arguments map.  Not 
> sure what the best way to implement this, but the use case would be creating 
> a StandardAnalyzer with a non-default set of stop words.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to