Hi Aaron, That's a great idea! Do we have decided on any deadline for 0.1.5 release?
Regards, Gagan On Sunday, March 17, 2013, Aaron McCurry wrote: > Thanks Tim, I think that we should create JIRA issues for these working > toward a 0.1.5 release. I can do that or other want before I get to them > that's cool. Also we should branch 0.1.4 to create 0.1.5. > > Also the new metrics will be easy to drop in, so I think that we should add > that as well. > > Thanks, > Aaron > > > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Tim Williams > <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Aaron McCurry > > <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > -Lucene 4.2 Upgrade > > > This is the big feature, but I spent a lot of time a few weeks ago > > > testing the resource management (InputIndex clones, Buffers, File GC, > > etc) > > > and geting it all working. So I feel really good about this code. > > > > > > -Automatic Slab configuration (Easy to integrate code) > > > This is simple but makes things easier to configure > > > > > > -Super Query Parser (Easy to integrate code) > > > This gives explicit control over the super queries > > > > > > There will probably be a couple of more things to add but most are > going > > to > > > be drop in replacements of existing code. > > > > > > Anything else that you can think of that would be good backport? > > > > Looks good, unless the new metrics stuffs is solid enough? I could > > take a stab at backporting the new auto slab configs if you want? > > > > --tim > > >
